Holocaust: A Jew-on-Jew False Flag Operation

At the Nuremberg Trials of Major War Criminals, Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher testified: “I did no more than echo what the leading Zionists had been saying”.

“The Zionists worked relentlessly to create fear among Jews in the Arab  countries after the Zionist state was established.” (like they did in Europe?) http://www.truetorahjews.org/naziismzionism


“A devil goes through the land,
The Jew he is, known to us all
As murderer of the peoples and polluter of the races,
The terror of children in every country!
He wants to ruin the youth.
He wants all peoples to die.
Have nothing to do with a Jew
Then you’ll be happy and gay!”

Hitler, Rosenberg, Goebbels and Streicher , many other Nazi leaders used statements from Zionists to validate their charges against the Jews of Germany.

Such are the efforts of Zionist leaders to this very day to maintain a high degree of anti-semitism in order to enable them, in feigned horror, to then point to anti-semitism to support their idolatrous and anti-Jewish cause. truetorahjews/naziismzionism

Thesis by Vaughn Klingenberg

[After literally months and months of investigation on the genesis and history of the Holocaust I have come to the reluctant conclusion that the Holocaust was in fact a (Big Zionist) Jew on (Little non-Zionist) Jew False Flag operation.

The evidence is so overwhelming on this matter that no other conclusion is as tenable. The facts supporting this thesis are irrefutable.]

Zionism was a vocal, but minority, Jewish movement at the turn of the 20th Century. True, many Jews would have liked a Jewish homeland, but few were willing to give up the comforts of European living and move to an undeveloped and desolate region such as Palestine.

This posed a seemingly insurmountable problem to extremely powerful and well positioned Jews who wanted a Jewish state–“Big Zionist Jews” as I term them.

These Jews in leadership positions needed to people their fledgling state with ordinary, hitherto non-Zionist Jews–or “Little Jews” as I term them.

So how to do this? What would have to happen to get Little Jews to eagerly make the journey to Palestine and become Zionists themselves? The answer: the Holocaust.

But wait, weren’t the Nazis the ones who authored and carried out the Holocaust? Surely this reportedly unassailable fact cannot be denied, can it? Isn’t one “blaming the victim” by assigning responsibility to Jews for the genesis and horrors of the Holocaust and not the Nazis?

The Jews were the victims here–we must not forget–not the perpetrators, right?

Well, not quite. To begin with, it must first be acknowledged that the Nazis were the most anti-colonialist European power during their reign in Germany.

This should not surprise anyone.

After all, Great Britain, France, Russia, and the United States all held, in one form or another, colonies abroad while Germany was stripped of its colonies after World War I.

Fomenting unrest in European colonies served both German interests as well as nationalist sentiment among the common people of the colonially dominated foreign state.

There was one exception to Nazi anti-colonialism, however, and that was that the Nazis supported a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

The Nazis encouraged Jews to emigrate to Palestine (a British colony) and even set up a transfer agreement, the Haavara Agreement of August 25th, 1933, to facilitate transferring German Jews to Palestine.

This was signed by the Zionist Federation of Germany and Nazi economic authorities.

Curiously, skipping ahead, when President Roosevelt finally called for an international meeting to take place in July of 1938 at Evian, France, representatives from 32 countries met to discuss if and how to relocate Jews from Nazi Germany; only the Dominican Republic agreed to accept more Jewish refugees.

Curiously, Nazi Germany was not invited to attend the Conference even though it was held right across the border.

As for Roosevelt’s ambassador to the meeting, the banker Myron Taylor, he was not even a government official but rather merely a personal friend of the President; this just goes to show how cavalier and unconcerned Roosevelt himself was in coming to the aid of Little Jews.

Perhaps significantly, “Evian” spelled backwards is “naive.”

Nazi Germany under Hitler certainly did not want a world war.

Hitler ran on the plank of returning German nationalists who had been split off from Germany (thanks to the woefully ill conceived national boundaries set forth in the Versailles Treaty) back to Germany proper.

Once he was able to do this, after the defeat of Poland and reincorporating Germans living there back into the Reich, Hitler was content to bring a halt to the war.

This is why Hitler and the Nazis waited, after conquering Poland, for three-quarters of a year before invading France.

This period is known of as the famous “Sitzkreig” or “sitting war.”

It was simply foolish and against all military principles and common sense not to immediately invade France right after the lightening Nazi victory over Poland.

This 9 month interim gave the French and British valuable time to ramp up their munitions manufacturing and call up more citizens for military conscription and training.

The Nazis had achieved their goal of reuniting Germans with Germany, and because the Nazis wanted the war now to end they went as long as they could before reluctantly invading France.

(As an interesting side note, the Nazis finally launched the invasion of France on the very day Winston Churchill, the bellicose and unabashed war-mongering minister, was sworn into office as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom on May 10th, 1940.)

This also explains why the third in command in the Nazi Reich, Rudolf Hess, later flew to Scotland on May 10, 1941, on the one year anniversary of the invasion of France, to negotiate a peace between England and Germany (only to be arrested and held in Spandau Prison in solitary confinement for 45+ years until he died; one wonders what things he could tell that so frightened the Allied and Zionist leadership so that they diligently kept him away from the public; many convicted Holocaust criminals served much less jail time and were then released!).

Nazi peacemakers would only confuse the Allied public over the justness of their cause so better to hold Hess incommunicado until his death in August of 1987, or so must have went Allied thinking.

Allied and Zionist Procrastination and the Holocaust

It is my contention that the Allied and Zionist leadership collaborated and were consciously and deliberately negligent in allowing–nay, ensuring–that the Holocaust happened.

I am not able to marshal all of the evidence for that here in this short essay so I will just list some of the more salient highlights that support this thesis.

To begin with, at the Casablanca Conference of January 14th to the 24th, 1943, Churchill and Roosevelt declared that only “unconditional surrender” was acceptable to the Allies.

While this sounds all well and good to xenophobes and pathological “patriots,” in real terms it meant that since there was no incentive for the Nazis to surrender conditionally that the war would be fought to its bitter end.

Furthermore, and significantly, this meeting took place just as the Nazis were undergoing their momentous defeat at Stalingrad in January of 1943.

This defeat of the Wehrmacht spelled the inevitable undoing of the Nazi Reich, so just as the Nazis were most prone to sue for a conditional peace, the Allies preempted that option by demanding only total, complete, and merciless surrender.

(Also as a curious aside, Churchill was once asked by a reporter if he would offer peace terms to the Nazis.

Churchill’s answer: “Of course not–they just might accept it!”) Needless to say, if the Allies accepted a Nazi surrender in 1943, literally millions of lives could have been spared, including those in the internment camps.

Still referencing the year 1943 and how the Allies deliberately procrastinated in bringing the War to an end, General George Marshall wanted to invade Nazi-occupied France on April 1st of 1943.

General Marshall was the one assigned to draw up plans for the sea-borne invasion of Europe; the name for this plan was Operation Overlord.

This too would have brought an earlier end to the war, but Roosevelt and Churchill over-ruled him and only got around to approving the sea-borne invasion over one year later, for June 6th, 1944.

Once again, millions of lives could have been spared had this earlier invasion gone forward.

Turning now to how the leader of the American Jewish community, Rabbi Stephen Wise, President of the Zionist Organization of America, and how he responded to the internment of millions of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe: Rabbi Wise ordered that absolutely no care packages be sent to malnourished Jews in the Nazi internment camps even though the Red Cross verified that the care packages were, in fact, delivered to the internees.

Rabbi Wise also deliberately tried to hinder publicity about the Holocaust; he actively intervened to prohibit the production of “We Will Never Die,” a pageant on the sufferings of Jews during the War.

“A frog sat in the green grass. He didn’t do this, he didn’t do that, he didn’t do anything at all. Blinded by the glitter of gold, everyone flew into his mouth.”

Why would Rabbi Wise do this? Why wouldn’t he want the world to know about the Holocaust?

Simple: this Big Jew Zionist leader wanted Jews to suffer as much as possible during the War so as to realized Rabbi Wise’s dream of establishing and peopling with Jews a Jewish state in Palestine.

If the War came to an end too quickly, the run-of-the-mill non-Zionist Jews would settle back into their comfortable European existence.

All Jews needed to become Zionists, and that Big Zionist goal has been largely very successfully accomplished today–courtesy of the Zionist and Allied orchestrated and manufactured Holocaust.

There was a famine in Nazi-occupied Europe during the last year and a half of the War, 1944 to 1945.

This meant that those on the very bottom rung of the social pyramid, namely, internment camp prisoners, would be the last to receive food. No surprise here.

What caps this off however is that the Allies completely destroyed the transportation infrastructure of Nazi-occupied Europe so that foodstuffs and supplies were severely interdicted, and this made things even worse in the camps.

Therefore, here as well, the Allies bear at least some responsibility for the severely emaciated prisoners held in German internment camps at the end of the War.

Of course the Allies and Big Jews such as Rabbi Wise claimed that there was no Holocaust happening to the Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe during the War (and, ironically, they very well may have been right–albeit duplicitous–because there is absolutely no independent scientific statistical evidence that anyone died of Zyklon B poisoning in the camps, but this is the subject matter of another essay).

“Why would President Roosevelt and the most prominent Jewish leader here in the U.S. want to silence any knowledge of the internment camps during the War?

Simple: because if they did not silence public knowledge of the Holocaust that would have required the Allies to both seek an earlier end to the war (once again by possibly accepting a conditional surrender from the Nazis) and because the Little Jews would not have suffered enough in the camps so as to convert them into die-hard Zionists and have them emigrate to Palestine.

“A haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks”

Simply put: the Big Zionist overlords needed a loyal cadre of Jewish denizens to rule over so they got their wish by fomenting and orchestrating what we know of today as “The Holocaust.”

Finally, what about the role of the Nazis in all of this? Surely they share a portion of blame.

Yes they do, but not as much as one has been pre-conditioned and indoctrinated to believe.

I like to use the analogy of a man holding a handgun to the head of a near-sighted victim.

The man represents a Big Zionist/Allied figure; the handgun represents a Nazi-figure; and the cowering, near-sighted, and kneeling victim is a Little Jew Holocaust-figure.

The victim can only see what is immediately in front of his face, the Luger/Nazi-figure; the victim does not see the figure who has his hand on the Luger’s trigger, the Big Zionist Jew.

This is how I have come to understand the Holocaust.

All that was left to do once the war was won was to unilaterally, unrelentingly, and universally blame the Nazis and the Germany citizenry for being solely responsible for the Holocaust, and self-serving propaganda eventually turns into dogmatic historical fact.

Of course this all goes a long way towards explaining the profound insecurity of the Holocaust community when it comes to challenges to their authority and why they are so insistent on demonizing and criminalizing Holocaust Truthers such as myself.

What the Big Jews fear most is that Little Jews just might–if they have courage enough to remove the blinders from their eyes–look into the mirror before uncritically assigning blame for the Holocaust to the usual suspects.

I could, of course, say much much more, but this should suffice for now. I leave it to Free-thinking independent readers to vet what I have written here and make up their own minds concerning who is really responsible for the Holocaust.

US prevented imminent Syrian chemical weapon attack-LOL

Former Congressman Ron Paul discusses a new Seymour Hersh article out this week showing that the US knew Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was not responsible for the chemical attack in April, but President Trump decided to bomb anyway.

DEBKAfile (Zionist Intel) June 28, 2017
Lies, lies, lies

The regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad halted preparations for its latest chemical weapon attack after Washington warned Damascus that it would pay a heavy price for such a strike, American Defense Secretary James Mattis told reporters on Wednesday. Mattis did not elaborate on the actions taken by Syria at its Shayrat airbase, which was attacked by the US in April in retaliation for a Syrian chemical attack on civilians.

Signs were gathering in Washington and the Middle East Tuesday, June 26 that the Trump administration was preparing a substantial military operation against the Syrian army and Bashar Assad’s allies, such as the foreign pro-Iranian Shiite militias and Hizballah. Some US military sources suggested that an American preemptive strike was in store in the coming hours to prevent Assad’s army from again resorting to chemical warfare against his people.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday night that the US “has identified potential preparations for another chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime that would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children.”

He said the activities were similar to preparations taken before an April 2017 attack that killed dozens of men, women and children, and warned that if “Mr. Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price.”

On April 4, the Syrians launched a chemical weapons attack, which killed 87 people, including 30 children, following which the Trump administration fired scores of Tomahawk missiles against a Syrian air base.

The US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley then futher stoked the tensions by declaring on Twitter that any chemical weapons attack by Bashar-Assad’s Syrian government “will be blamed on Assad but also on Russia and Iran who support him killing his own people.”

Haley’s tweet ended with the cliffhanger: “Stay tuned for more tomorrow.”

Image result for USS George H.W. Bush memeDebkafile’s military sources add: An American attack on Syria, whether preemptive or punitive, may be launched from the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush in the eastern Mediterranean.

It was from the decks of this vessel that US Navy fighter jets took off on June 18 to down a Syrian SU-22 fighter bomber over eastern Syrian. A repetition of a US carrier-based attack on Syria would challenge the warning Moscow issued to Washington on June 24 after the Syrian warplane was shot down:

“From now on, in areas where Russian aviation performs combat missions in the skies of Syria, any airborne objects found west of the Euphrates River, including aircraft and unmanned vehicles belonging to the international coalition, tracked by means of Russian land and air anti-aircraft defense, will be considered air targets.”

That warning was intended to mark a red line against US flights crossing through central and western Syria. Posted at Latakia, on Syrian’s Mediterranean coast in the west are advanced Russian anti-air S-400 and S-300 missiles.

US Intelligence Officer: “Every Single Terrorist Attack In US Was a False Flag Attack”

Image result for 911 false flag

You can’t understand what’s been going on around the world with American covert operations and the Israeli covert operations until you understand that the two countries have this secret arrangement”.-c-span.org/video/dangerous-liaisons

Waking Times Media

Apart from documents that have outlined supposed terrorist threats, like Al-Qaeda, and their connection to US intelligence agencies, like the CIA, there are a number of whistleblowers that have come out adding more fuel to the fire.

Because not many are even aware of these documents, letting people know about a truth that can be hard for people to accept, let alone ponder the possibility is very important. It’s just one aspect of the veil that’s been blinding the masses for quite some time now.

The latest whistleblower is David Steele, a 20-year Marine Corps intelligence officer, and the second-highest-ranking civilian in the U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence. He is a former CIA clandestine services case officer, and this is what he had to say:

“Most terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum.”

What Is A “False Flag Attack?”

A great example of a false flag attack is 9/11, something that many people believe to be a creation of US intelligence agencies, or some entity above the government (one that controls what Eisenhower called “the military industrial complex”).

The idea is that these so called terrorist attacks are created by this group, in order to justify the infiltration of other countries, and to justify a heightened state of “national security.”

As a result, in the eyes of the citizenry, war and mass murder are justified, when the intentions behind these actions are something the citizenry has no idea about.

This is why we see a false sense of patriotism programmed into many people, especially in the United States.

Men and women join this massive military machine with good hearts, thinking that they are serving their country and fighting terrorism, when they are doing the complete opposite. They are only participating in a fabricated war based on lies and misinformation.

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States.” – Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook

London Bridge false flag alert – even CNN says “psy-op”

By Kevin Barrett

CNN, which suggested the Manchester bombing could be a false flag,  just dropped the word “psy-op” into its early report on this evening’s “white van and stabbings” event in London.

If CNN continues to label each emerging terror drama a “false flag” or “psy-op” in their breaking news coverage, I may have to either apply for a job there, or look for another line of work.

But seriously, folks…what could explain such amazing outbursts of candor from the Establishment mouthpieces over at CNN?

I just spoke with Webster Tarpley after his presentation at the Left Forum in New York City, and he posits that “hatred of Trump is bringing out the best in people” who were formerly purveyors of mainstream propaganda pablum. If that is the case, we may expect to see The New York Times, CNN, Washington Post  and the like suddenly come clean with headlines like: “The war on terror is a hoax, 9/11 was an inside job – sorry we didn’t tell you earlier.”

But I think Ole Dammegard’s theory is far more plausible. Ole says false flag terror events are scripted psy-ops orchestrated by a freemasonic-satanic criminal gang that holds, as part of its occult belief system, the bizarre notion that “if we warn you and reveal what we’re doing and you let us get away with it, then the bad karma is on you, not us.”

That is why they stage false flags on dates with numerological significance, as I reported in my earlier article Manchester false flag: “Man, 22, kills 22 on May 22.” 

That is why, for example, the Rothschilds’ Economist Magazine told the whole world in late 2014 that there would be two big terror attacks in Paris in 2015, and the second attack would happen on 11/13/15.

Other well-known examples of false flag terror perps telling us what they’re going to do include the famous Simpsons 9/11 imagery, the Lone Gunman TV series,  smearing the Brussels Airport logo in blood all over the floor of the Bataclan to signal that the next false flag would be in Brussels, and on and on.

Ole explains that the bizarre superabundance of obvious evidence that 9/11 and follow-up false flags are inside jobs may not be a sign of incompetence. Instead, he suggests, the perpetrators intentionally fail to hide their tracks, in accordance with their occult believe that to do so absolves them of karmic guilt.

I will be busy presenting at the Left Out Forum tomorrow – watch the livestream HERE – so I won’t have time to scour the internet for evidence that this attack, like the previous ones in Manchester and Westminster (not to mention Paris) is a false flag.

But since all such events are now presumptive false flags – even CNN is jumping on the bandwagon – I think we can assume that this one, like the previous one in Manchester, was a Gladio B operation designed to throw the British election to Theresa May and stop 9/11 truth supporting anti-Zionist Jeremy Corbyn.

False Flags in “Israel” Target Palestinians, Israeli Citizens, American, Whatever Works


An event just in time for traitor/pedophile Biden visit

Richard Silverstein is a really righteous Jew, an Israel critique but he believes that Israel has a right to exist in Palestine. To me that is simply wrong. But he analyzes events well and writes articles such as this. Credit where credit is due.

Tel Aviv Attacker Executed by Security Forces; Targeted Shin Bet Agent; Father Was Palestinian Collaborator

By

Today, the inevitable happened.  Nasha’at Milhem, who had attacked a Tel Aviv bar last Friday and killed three Israelis, was himself murdered by security forces.  I say “executed,” because this has become standard policy with all Palestinians suspected of lifting even a pinkie finger against Israelis.  They are almost all “put down” like mad dogs.  Because they’re Palestinian.  Not worthy of being treated like human beings.  I even predicted his liquidation here:

“There can be no doubt that Milhem will not be apprehended alive.  Israel’s security services specialize in confronting Palestinian militants dedicated to going out in a blaze of resistance and glory.  They are inevitably killed after being asked to surrender and then responding with a hail of bullets, to which security forces had no choice but to respond, killing the suspect in the process.”

nasha'at milhem executed

Planted weapon placed near Milhem’s body

 

The standard narrative offered by the security apparatus is that the terrorists seek to die in a hail of bullets like the conventional Hollywood mob movie.  Here’s Haaretz’s bogus version:

Nashat Melhem, the suspected gunman behind the Tel Aviv shooting last week, was shot dead in a firefight with police forces in his hometown of Arara in northern Israel on Friday.

Nashaat Milhem, sought to avenge his father’s collaboration with Shin Bet by assassination his handler

Why would a reporter merely transcribe a claim like this in their report?  Did they examine the scene to determine whether there was a firefight?  Did Milhem fire any bullets at anyone?  As usual, even the supposedly liberal champion Haaretz swallows the security narrative hook, line and sinker.

My take: nope, no firefight.  Just an outright liquidation of terror vermin, as Israeli police and Shin Bet commanders see it.  Though I object generally to terror porn, I’m displaying a picture of his corpse because I want to show the effrontery of the security forces who I am almost certain planted a weapon next to Milhem’s body.  An image of the murder scene from a different angle shows a second pistol of some kind (or a separate part of the weapon lying by his side) in his hand.  This is no different from the scores of cases in which they planted knives next to the bodies of Palestinians murdered by the same Israeli executioner-security forces.

mohammed milhem ruimi funeral

Mourners at funeral of Shimon Ruimi. Pixellated face is that of “Shin,” Shin Bet agent who “ran” Mohammed Milhem, and who was Nata’ash’s intended target.

Compare this to the treatment accorded the settler terror conspirators.  They murdered an 18 month-old baby, his mother and father.  Were they executed when apprehended?  Were their families’ homes torn down in retribution as regularly happens with Palestinian suspects (surely, the Milhem home will be demolished if it hasn’t been already)?  No, none of this happened.  Further, one of the murderers, a Jewish Shin Bet collaborator, betrayed his handler and refused to reveal the plot.  He was at the scene of the crime and a willing participant.  He, Israel Keller, has been released from detention and likely will remain uncharged because to do so would embarrass the Shin Bet.

Justice is blind, as far as Jewish terror is concerned.  Palestinian terror?  Justice has 20-20 vision.

But there is a larger story here as well.  Israel was rife with rumors sweeping social media that Milhem himself was a Shin Bet collaborator who deliberately killed one of the victims, Shimon Ruimi, who was supposedly a Shin Bet agent or even his handler.  These rumors seemed quite promising, and the half-baked story offered by the authorities seemed unconvincing.

But my regular security source clammed up when asked for comment.  So I couldn’t post anything definitive about the incident.  Now, I can.  My source reveals:

“Nash’aat’s father, Muhammad, was/is a Shabak collaborator, and that’s why he got a licence for a gun – a very rare thing for an Arab citizen. One of his handlers was “Shin” (‘ש), a close friend of Shimon Ruimi. Muhammad is now being interrogated by Shabak, suspected of involvement in an apparent plot (possibly ISIS-inspired) to assassinate “Shin” who was in the TA pub with several friends, celebrating the birthday of one of them. Nash’aat used his father’s gun to fire at the pub trying to hit “Shin”, but missed and killed his friend (Ruimi) and another man (who worked in the pub). No other details are available, and it’s still unclear why he later murdered the Arab taxi driver.”

As I’m quoting my source, I’ll add my own qualifications of his statement.  I don’t understand why the son of the collaborator would be the one to exact revenge, unless he was ashamed of his father’s spying on behalf of the Shin Bet and sought redemption through this attack.  I’m also leery about crediting any outside force for the attack or even for inspiring the attack.  It seems too convenient to link ISIS to the attack.  It follows the standard Likudist narrative that Israel is a gentle creature swimming in a sea of Islamist piranhas.

As I’ve written here numerous times, Palestinians have all too many legitimate domestic grievances and too much suffering to explain their taking up arms against a sea of troubles, aka Israel.  Bringing in external factors merely confuses things, which is what the Israeli regime wants.

Russia Vetoes West’s Trick Syria Resolution At UN

Image result for US, the UK and France axis of evil

 

It’s the “threat of military action” part that we know the west is going to run with, just like they did in Libya. Russia will not rubber stamp another massacre. Zio-US, UK, France are just trying, and failing, to be tricky devils here. Also interested to see if there is a genuine investigation which wouldn’t bode well for Zio -US since they are behind all false flags.

“The main objection to the resolution is that it apportioned blame prior to an objective outside investigation of the incident… The outcome of the vote was predestined, because we disagreed categorically with a document that was fundamentally misconceived,” said Vladimir Safronkov, Russia’s deputy envoy at the Security Council, who also accused other states and international organizations of making “no effort” to inspect the site of the alleged attack.

Accepting the resolution would also “legitimize” the April 7 air strike carried out by the US on the Shayrat airbase in northern Syria, from which Washington claims government planes carrying the deadly sarin nerve gas took off, Safronkov said.

Britain’s representative Matthew Rycroft said Russia’s veto – the eighth since the Syrian conflict began in 2011 – was “indefensible,” and reminded Moscow of its own promise to rid the country of chemical weapons following an alleged attack in 2013. Oh pa-leeze.

Syria WMD ‘Facts’ Were Manufactured to Fit U.S. Conclusion for Chemical Weapons Ghouta Attack in 2013

France’s President Francois Hollande said Moscow was taking on a “heavy burden of responsibility” for “obstructing” the efforts to end the Syrian crisis. (BS)

Washington’s envoy to the Security Council and  Zionist AIPAC member, Nikki Haley, noted she was still hopeful of future cooperation with Moscow, and urged Russia to exert its influence over Bashar Assad to stop the “madness and violence” of the conflict, in which over 400,000 people are estimated to have been killed.

Unlike the earlier drafts of the resolution on the alleged incident, the final document did not lay the blame for it on Damascus. It also referred to the incident as the “reported use of chemical weapons” rather than stating that such use did take place as a fact.

However, the draft leaned heavily on the Syrian government in terms of demands to submit to an investigation of the incident. It said inspectors chosen by the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) must be given prompt and unrestricted access to “any and all sites” they choose, provided with flight plans and logs they request, and given the names of military officers “in command of any aircraft” they probe.

Damascus would also have to “arrange meetings requested, including with generals or other officers, within no more than five days of the date on which such meeting is requested.”

In the event of non-compliance with the terms, Syria could be exposed to military action mandated by the UN Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.

The rebel forces controlling Khan Shaykhun were only asked to “provide delay-free and safe access” to the site of the reported incident.

The data which, according to the US, “purports to be evidence [of the Syrian government chemical attack]” is “very flimsy” and “relies on mainly open source materials, by which they [the US] mean evidence from jihadi sources, evidence from al Nusra [Front] and what they called the social media,” the former British ambassador to Syria, Peter Ford said.