The ‘Tour of Terror’

Image result for billy wilder buchenwald animated gif

Billy Wilder on set of “The Holocaust”

Related image

“False flag terrorism” occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy, or to shape public opinion, to demonize or to convince a population to do something (like hop on boats to Palestine)

There are many examples of false flag attacks throughout history. For example, in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel’s Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government. Click here for verification. This is what they do; provide a live, real-time event to watch and more, from the controllers’ electronic gadgets.

If Ole is correct, the “elite” psychopaths view false flag terror events online like some of us view the Grey Cup, FIFA tournaments, the Olympics… but they participate online in these “games” even SIMULTANEOUSLY across the globe like it’s an athletic sports event. It’s their entertainment!

Ending NATO, a Monstrous Institution

Image result for israel enters NATO

Israel is on the march where it really counts. Soon after the de facto Saudi recognition of Israel last month now comes this further step making Israel a de facto member of NATO. As of this month Israel has “Official Representation” at NATO HQ in Brussels.

US led NATO and its allies, including Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Apartheid Israel, are perpetuating these crimes beneath ridiculous banners of “humanitarian interventions” and/or the “Global War On Terror”

The coercive strategies being used include these:

  • Destroying hospitals and infrastructure
  • Starvation
  • Disinformation campaigns/erasing “history”
  • Balkanization/partitioning
  • Bombing civilian populations

The end-game is to de-populate and to destroy target countries and to subjugate the remaining population.

• June 5, 2017

Their anxiety about the future of NATO, recently on full display again when the American president was in Europe, could not be bettered as a measure of the incapacity of Europe’s top politicians to guide their continent and represent its populations.

Through its provocations of Moscow, NATO systematically helps increase the risk of a military confrontation.

By thus sabotaging its declared purpose of preserving collective security for the countries on either side of the Atlantic, it erases its fundamental reason for being and right to exist.

Grasping these facts ought be enough to fuel moves aimed at quickly doing away with NATO. But it is terrible for more and easily overlooked reasons.

NATO’s survival prevents the political entity that is the European Union from becoming a significant global presence for reasons other than its economic weight.

If you cannot have a defense policy of your own you also deprive yourself of a foreign policy.

Without a substantive foreign policy, Europe does not show anything that anyone might consider ‘a face’ to the world.

Without such a face to the outside, the inside cannot come to terms about what it stands for, and substitutes meaningless platitudes for answers to the question as to why it should exist in the first place.

shutterstock_119677318 NATO is an example of an institution that has gotten completely out of hand through European complacency, intellectual laziness, and business opportunism. As a security alliance it requires a threat.

When the one that was believed to exist during the Cold War disappeared, a new one had to be found.

Forged for defense against what was once believed to be an existential threat, it only began actually deploying its military might after that threat had disappeared, for its illegal war against Serbia.

Once it had jumped that hurdle, it was encouraged to continue jumping toward imagined global threats.

Its history since the demise of its original adversary has been deplorable, as its European member states were made party to war crimes resulting from actions at Washington’s behest for objectives that have made a dead letter of international law.

It has turned some European governments into liars when they told their populations that sending troops to Afghanistan was for the purpose of assorted humanitarian purposes like reconstructing that country, rather than fighting a war against Taleban forces intent on reclaiming their country from American occupation.

Afghanistan did not, as was predicted at the time, turn into a graveyard for NATO, next to that of the British Empire, the Soviet Union and – farther back – Alexander the Great.

Having survived Afghanistan, NATO continued to play a significant role in the destruction of Gaddafi’s Libya, and in the destruction of parts of Syria through covertly organising, financing, and arming ISIS forces for the purpose of overthrowing the Assad government.

And it continues to serve as a cover for the war making elements in Britain and France. America’s coup in the Ukraine in 2014, which resulted in a crisis in relations with Russia, gave NATO a new lease on life as it helped create an entirely uncalled for and hysterical fear of Russia in Poland and the Baltic states.

NATO repudiates things that we are said to hold dear. It is an agent of corruption of thought and action in both the United States and Europe.

Through propaganda that distorts the reality of the situation in the areas where it operates, and perennial deceit about its true objectives, NATO has substituted a now widely shared false picture of geopolitical events and developments for one that, even if haphazard, used to be pieced together by independent reporters for mainstream media whose own tradition and editors encouraged discovery of facts.

This propaganda relies to a large extent on incessant repetition for its success. It can generally not be traced to NATO as a source of origin because it is being outsourced to a well-funded network of public relations professionals.

The Atlantic Council is NATO’s primary PR organization. It is connected with a web of think tanks and NGO’s spread throughout Europe, and very generous to journalists who must cope with a shrinking and insecure job environment.

This entity is well-versed in Orwellian language tricks, and for obvious reasons must mischaracterise NATO itself as an alliance instead of a system of vassalage.

Alliance presupposes shared purposes, and it cannot be Europe’s purpose to be controlled by the United States, unless we now accept that a treasonous European financial elite must determine the last word on Europe’s future.

An influential policy deliberation NGO known as the International Crisis Group (ICG), is one of the organizations linked with the Atlantic Council.

It operates as a serious and studious outfit, carrying an impressive list of relatively well-known names of associates, and studies areas of the world harbouring conflicts or about-to-be conflicts that could undermine world peace and stability.

Sometimes this group does offer information that is germane to a situation, but its purpose has in effect become one of making the mainstream media audience view the situation on the ground in Syria, or the ins and outs of North Korea, or the alleged dictatorship in Venezuela, and so on, through the eyeballs of the consensus creators in American foreign policy.

NATO repudiates political civilisation. It is disastrous for European intellectual life as it condemns European politicians and the thinking segment of the populations in its member states to be locked up in what may be described as political kindergarten, where reality is taught in terms of the Manichean division between bad guys and superheroes.

While Europe’s scholars, columnists, TV programmers and sophisticated business commentators rarely pay attention to NATO as an organization, and are generally oblivious to its propaganda function, what it produces condemns them to pay lip service to the silliest geopolitical fantasies.

NATO is not only terrible for Europe, it is very bad for the United States and the world in general, for it has handed to America’s elites important tools aiding its delusional aim of fully dominating the planet.

This is because NATO provides the most solid external support for sets of assumptions that allegedly lend a crucial moral dimension to America’s warmaking.

NATO does not exist for the sake of indispensable European military prowess, which hardly has not been impressive. It exists as legal justification for Washington to keep nuclear weapons and military bases in Europe.

It obviously also exists as support for America’s military-industrial complex.

But its moral support ought to be considered its most significant contribution. Without NATO, the conceptual structure of a ‘West’ with shared principles and aims would collapse.

NATO was once the organisation believed to ensure the continued viability of the Western part what used to be known as the ‘free world’. Such connotations linger, and lend themselves to political exploitation.

The ‘free world’ has since the demise of the Soviet Union not been much invoked. But ‘the West’ is still going strong, along with the notion of Western values and shared principles, with ‘the good’ in the form of benevolent motives automatically assumed to be on its side.

This gives the powers that be in Washington a terrific claim in the realm of widely imagined moral aspects of geopolitical reality.

They have inherited the mantle of the leader of the ‘free world’ and ‘the West’, and since there has not been a peep of dissension about this from the other side of the Atlantic, the claim appears true and legitimate in the eyes of the world and the parties concerned.

In the meantime the earlier American claim to speak and act on behalf of the free world was broadened and seemingly depoliticised by a substitute claim of speaking and acting on behalf of the ‘international community’.

There is of course no such thing, but that doesn’t bother editors who keep invoking it when some countries or the bad guys running them do things that are not to Washington’s liking. Doing away with NATO would pull the rug from under the ‘international community’.

Such a development would then reveal the United States, with its current political system and priorities in international affairs, as a criminal power and the major threat to peace in the world.

I can hear an objection that without this resonance of moral claims the activities serving the ‘full spectrum dominance’ aim would have been carried out anyway.

If you think so, and if you can stand reading again what the neocons were producing between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraqi in 2003, subtract all references to moral clarity and the necessity for the United States to serve as moral beacon for the world from that literature, and you will see that preciously little argument remains for American war-making that ensued.

shutterstock_591252749 The spinelessness of the average European politician has added up to huge encouragement of the United States in its post-Cold War military adventurism.

With forceful reminders from Europe about what those much vaunted supposedly shared political principles actually stood for, American rhetoric could not have been the same.

Strong European condemnation of the shredding of the UN Charter, and the jettisoning of the principles adopted at the Nuremberg trials, would have made it much more difficult for George W Bush, Dick Cheney, and the neocons to go where blind fanaticism and hubris, with imagined economic advantage, took them.

Perhaps more importantly, it might have given a relatively weak American protest movement the necessary added energy to rise to the level of effectiveness once attained by the anti-Vietnam activists as they imprinted themselves on the political culture of the 60s and 70s.

European dissent might not have halted but could have slowed the transformation of much of the mainstream media into neocon propaganda assets.

As it is, NATO exists today in a realm of discourse in which revered post-World War II liberal conditions and practices are still believed to exist.

It is an apolitical and ahistorical realm determined by hubris and misplaced self-confidence, in which powers that have utterly altered these practices and negated its positive aspects are not acknowledged.

It is a realm in which America’s pathological condition of requiring an enemy as a source of everlasting profit is not acknowledged. It is a realm in which America’s fatuous designs for complete control over the world is not acknowledged. It is a realm of foreign policy illusions.

NATO is supposed to guard putative Western values that in punditry observations have something to do with what the Enlightenment has bestowed on Western culture.

But it deludes staunch NATO supporters, who cannot bring themselves to contemplate the possibility that what they have long trusted to be an agent of protection, has in fact become a major force that destroys those very qualities and principles.

There is a further more tangible political/legal reason why NATO is monstrous. It is steered by nonelected powers in Washington, but is not answerable to identifiable entities within the American military system.

It is not answerable to any of the governing institutions of the European Union. Its centre in Brussels exists effectively outside the law. Its relations with ‘intelligence agencies’ and their secret operations remain opaque.

Who is doing what and where are all questions to which no clear, legally actionable, information is made available.

NATO has thereby become a tool of intimidation lacking any compatibility with democratic political organisation. An autocrat aspiring to unfettered rule with which to operate anywhere in the world would find in NATO the ideal institutional arrangements.

All this should be of our utmost concern. Because all this means that NATO is now one of the world’s most horrible organizations that at the same time has become so politically elusive, apparently, that there is no European agent with enough of a grip on it to make it disappear.

Mae Brussell: Adolf Hitler Buried in 1987

Hitler survived WW2 because he was in collaboration with the Zionists and allies. Mae Brussell, who was Jewish, never zeroed in on the Zionist hidden hand, she has fingered Nazis in their place. The Zionist hidden hand must have been very obscure in her time yet she singles out Jewish criminal elements without  mentioning they are Jews. Zionism is not in Mae Brussell’s vocabulary. Also note the European terror events and the terrorists that are discussed. It’s deep state, NATO, Gladio and the Vatican which is all still very active! She covers a lot of ground in this episode.

Ken Livingstone has claimed there was at one point “real collaboration” between the Nazis and Jews, ahead of a hearing concerned with whether he has brought the Labour party into disrepute.

The former London mayor made the fresh series of highly controversial remarks before the start of an internal party tribunal that is hearing evidence about his suspension from the Labour party a year ago.

Livingstone’s comments expanded on his claim that Hitler supported Zionism because the Nazi government signed the Haavara agreement, which facilitated the relocation of Jews to Palestine in 1933 before the Third Reich turned to mass murder and extermination. The agreement allowed a portion of Jewish emigrants’ possessions, which they were forced to hand over before they left Germany, to be re-claimed through transfers to Palestine as German export goods.
Ken Livingstone: ‘I didn’t say Hitler was a Zionist’

Referring to Hitler, Livingstone said: “He didn’t just sign the deal. The SS set up training camps so that German Jews who were going to go there could be trained to cope with a very different sort of country when they got there. When the Zionist movement asked, would the Nazi government stop a Jewish rabbi doing their sermons in Yiddish and make them do it in Hebrew, he agreed to that.

“He passed a law saying the Zionist flag and the swastika were the only flags that could be flown in Germany. An awful lot. Of course, they started selling Mauser pistols to the underground Jewish army. So you had right up until the start of the second world war real collaboration.”

He also claimed that when senior Nazis objected to sending Jews to Palestine in case it created a Jewish state, a directive came from Hitler ordering them to continue with the policy.

Livingstone was originally suspended “for bringing the party into disrepute” after MPs accused of him of antisemitism and making offensive comments about Hitler supporting Zionism.


False Flags: CFR, NATO, and Israel

“It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. It’s mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.” –    silenced…JFK

start at 3:40 __Israelis always found at the scene of false flags in Europe

Ole Dammegard investigates false flags on location, I’d say he’s the best false flag investigator in town!

NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization)+CFR (Council of Foreign Relations, think tank founded in 1921)

America’s foreign policy elites, as exemplified most especially by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), have been laboring for decades to empower the United Nations with its own global military, one that could carry out UN mandates without having to seek ad hoc military coalitions from often-reluctant member states.

For the past two decades, NATO has increasingly filled this role: in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, the Gulf of Aden, Libya.

The new model of NATO terrorism is still to a large extent the same as the old one – use urban terror to scare the domestic population away from constructive policies and towards the consolidation of the security state, provide an enemy image, provide a guerrilla force to harass Russia and China, and to assist in the overthrow of target governments. Gladio is alive and well, it has just shifted gears.

Secret societies are shaping a new world order from behind the scenes. All these groups operate in considerable secrecy, away from the scrutiny of the American public.

THE BILDERBERG GROUP, CFR, IMF, TRILATERAL COMMISSION, AND THE EU /Rockefeller, The king of all secret societies

Image result for bilderberg animated gif

“Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe (and America) say what they never dare say in public.”

The Bilderberg club was founded by the Swedish Jew Joseph Retinger . It is financed by the Rockefeller Group, the Rothschild House, the Dillon Real Bank, the Warburg Bank , all dominated by the Jewish world, as well as by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

 An excerpt from an article from CFR website:

“Anti-Semitism has always been a kind of test—a reliable measure of a nation’s moral and social health. When the rights of Jews are violated, all human rights are insecure. When Jews and Jewish institutions are targeted, all minorities have reason for fear. And by this standard, America has cause for introspection.”

List of high-profile CFR members

NBC’s Brian Williams is a member. So is CBS’s Katie Couric, ABC’s Diane Sawyer, and MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski. Former anchors Dan Rather (CBS) and Tom Brokaw (NBC) are also members. Other media members include Bob Schieffer (CBS), Barbara Walters (ABC), Judy Woodruff (CNN), Paula Zahn (CNN), Lesley Stahl (CBS 60-M Minutes), George R. Stephanopoulos (ABC), Jim Lehrer (PBS), David R. Gergen, (CNN), Fareed Zakaria (CNN), Terry Moran (ABC), Charlie Rose (PBS), Rupert Murdoch (NewsCorp/FOX), Bernard Kalb (CNN), Morton Kondracke (The McLaughlin Group/Roll Call), and Garrick Utley (NBC/CNN).

Print journalists and columnists include Katrina vanden Heuvel (The Nation), Peggy Noonan (Wall Street Journal), David Schlesinger (Reuters), Judith Miller (NY Times), Gene Lyons (Salon),  Charles Krauthammer (Columnist), Marc A. Thiessen (columnist), David E. Sanger (NY Times), David Remnick (The New Yorker), Jack Rosenthal (NY Times), P.J. O’Rourke (Columnist), James L. McGregor (Journalist), Jon Meacham (Newsweek/PBS), Daniel P. Henninger (Wall Street Journal/FOX), Jim Hoagland (Washington Post), David B. Ensor (Journalist), Monica Crowley (Talk-Radio), Sidney S. Blumenthal father of journalist Max Blumenthal (Salon), and Mark Helprin (Time), to name but a few.

Here is a listing of others that are part of the CFR, including district judges, a Supreme Court judge, noted politicians, military officials, industrial tycoons, the ultra-rich, sports commissioners, and even Hollywood notables.

Grover G. Norquist
Janet Napolitano
John D. Negroponte
Condoleezza Rice
Dick Cheney
Richard B. Myers
Robert M. Gates
John Deutch
Elliott Abrams
Madeleine K. Albright
John Alexander
Dick Clark
Michael R. Bloomberg
George Soros
Timothy F. Geithner
Alan Greenspan
Dianne Feinstein
Thomas S. Foley
Richard A. Gephardt
Newton L. Gingrich
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Charles N. Goldman
Guido Goldman
Marshall I. Goldman
Merle D. Goldman
Neal D. Goldman
Harold E. Ford Jr.
William H. Frist
William H. Danforth
Thomas A. Daschle
Christopher J. Dodd
Jim Baker
Rudy Boschwitz
F. Stephen Larrabee (Rand Corp/NSC)
Joseph I. Lieberman
Walter F. Mondale
Haley Barbour
Bob Graham
Marc Grossman
Caroline Kennedy
Edward Kennedy Jr.
Jesse Jackson
Gary Hart
Teresa Heinz Kerry
David M. Rubenstein (Carlyle Group)
David Rockefeller
David Rockefeller Jr.
John D. Rockefeller IV
Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Mark F. Brzezinski
Mika Brzezinski
Zbigniew Brzezinski

Charles F. MacCormack (Save The Children)

Michael Douglas
George Clooney
Warren Beatty
Angelina Jolie
Robert L. Rosen
John Spencer

Paul Tagliabu (NFL)
David Stern (NBA)

Fouad Ajami

Madeleine Albright

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Liz Cheney

Dwight D. Eisenhower
Newt Gingrich
John Yoo

It’s Imperialism, Stupid

Western Imperialism for Dummies 3 min vid

I roll my eyes every time I read the words “fighting ISIS”… it’s merely euphemism for perpetual war.
The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, also known as the Yinon Plan, is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.
Saudi Arabia believes “ISIS” cannot be “defeated” unless Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is removed from power. Turkey has just convinced NATO nations that the war against “ISIS” can only be “won” if Turkey’s traditional Kurdish opponents are neutralized first. The US “fights ISIS” for Israel. Israel sees only one way to “defeat” “ISIS” is to destroy Iran. Russia is “fighting ISIS” [imperialist props] = power struggle against western imperialism where Russia has interest. It’s all called “fighting ISIS”.

Israeli commandos save Islamic militants from Syria | Daily Mail

Israel acknowledges it is helping Syrian rebel fighters | Times of Israel

UN Reveals Israeli Links With Syrian Rebels | Haaretz

Exclusive: Israel Is Tending to Wounded Syrian Rebels | Foreign Policy

Israel Helps ISIS Recruit Militants In Syria | Middle East Press

Israel Key Link in Exporting ISIS Oil | The Real News Network

Image result for isis NEWS animated gif

“Fight ISIS” for Israel

Ukraine’s Zionist Psyop

truthsector 2015

After almost a year and half of Euromaidan (Євромайдан, Yevromaidan) deceptions and violence, at least since November 2013, it is now more than time that the people around the world are being told the truth and being presented the facts about a dangerous and well-planned psychological operation that has been unfolding in Ukraine and the Western(-ized) press, both mainstream and “alternative.”

Although it is apparently for most people and media outlets intriguing to follow the military buildup for a massive clash in Ukraine that can very well become the much anticipated world war 3 there is a more important account to be reported about, loose ends of this masterminded conflict that 99% of the establishment and alternative media refuses to tie together, deliberately.

Why? One may ask. Because this 99% of these news outlets are profiteering from reporting about and fueling only the NATO and Russian armament hype by raking in royal advertising and “prepper gadgets” revenues.

One should feel convinced that in both the media blocks at least a dozen of news anchors and journalists exist who would have the courage to report the essential truth concerning an escalating conflict that has the potential to determine the further course of your personal future too.

Unfortunately for those persons who are eager to consume even the darkest truths 99% of both media blocks fails to satisfy the needs and fails to face its responsibilities.

Zionist Psyop


When the above subtitle makes you feel uncomfortable then that only shows that I am about to address something that most people have been programmed to avoid due to fears of likely being branded as an ‘antisemite’, a program that has worked very effectively since years BEFORE world war 2.

It’s been tested for decades now and it has proven to be robust, especially in times of war.

So lets cut to the chase here. Shall we? Lets document what the unrest and deception in Ukraine is certainly also about but what the media blocks deliberately refuse to acknowledge.

It can not be denied by any serious observer that at the very beginning of Euromaidan, and during the run-up to it, a Zionist  psychological operation had been rolled out, that has since then obviously expanded extensively as intended.

The evidence for this is available and cannot be denied by anyone who is really honest with him or herself.

For example, it is well known that jewish oligarch Viktor Pinchuk has been donating large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation prior to Euromaidan which eventually resulted in multiple Clinton Global Initiative alumni graduating “into the ranks of Ukraine’s parliament, while a former Clinton pollster went to work as a lobbyist for Pinchuk at the same time Clinton was working in government.”

In addition to other donations that the Clinton Foundation collected, also Pinchuk’s 2008-2013-14 donations were deployed to “train future Ukrainian leaders to modernize Ukraine. … to make Ukraine a successful, free, modern country based on European values.”

In short, to eventually allow for the undemocratic annexation of Ukraine by the EU dictatorship. A move that Russia smelled from miles away and years in advance.

Pinchuk, however, is not the only jewish oligarch who has been funding the “spontaneous” anti-Russian movement in Ukraine. There are more, Khalomoisky (Kolomoisky), Sergei Taruta

Also Yatsenyuk, Ukraine’s prime minister, and Ukrainian president Poroshenko share the same semitic roots. These are just the most prominent who now also occupy the most important positions in Ukraine, as was intended from the very start.

As the Euromaidan frenzy was successfully launched and the violence exploded – as intended by the US, the EU, Israel and the sponsoring oligarchs – antisemitic flyers were distributed by the semitic alliance, jews started to participate violently, a jewish fighting unit (sotnia) was created and provocateurs were sent out, an Israeli visa and citizenship were offered to an Ukrainian oligarch and an Ukrainian ex-minister on the run, jewish funerals were attended by neo-nazis, Ukrainian jews returned from Israel to apply their Israeli Defence Forces training and the Israeli government forged new bonds with Ukraine’s extremist neo-nazis, “nationalists” who are by the way also responsible for the Odessa massacre in which people were cowardly trapped in buildings and burned alive.

All under the watchful eyes of the US, the EU and the IMF vulture.

All of this has of course a provable common purpose. Such events don’t happen by coincidence after all.


Ukrainian General: “Ukraine is under Zionist occupation.”


Delta, the nom de guerre of the Jewish commander of a Ukrainian street-fighting

One can easily conclude that the whole semitic psyop serves to demonize Russia – to justify a war in which the US, NATO and the Israeli government without a doubt are the aggressors, equally provable by the aforementioned events in and regarding Ukraine – and to put the jewish community in the planned position of “poor victims.”

Following the exact same MO as occurred years before there was even any mentioning of a WW2 “holocaust,” then by publishing propaganda that claimed that 6,000,000 jews were in danger – a number that provably and falsely has been and is being associated with world war 2 death camps: 10 newspapers dating from 1915 to 1938 (The Sun New York, June 6, 1915; New York Times, October 18, 1918; New York Times, September 8, 1919; New York Times, November 12, 1919; Atlanta Constitution, February 23, 1920; New York Times, May 7, 1920; New York Times, July 20, 1921; Montreal Gazette, December 29, 1931; New York Times, May 31, 1936; New York Times, February 23, 1938) – before there was any mentioning by governments and press back then of any holocaust and before alleged holocaust activities in Germany – attest to the fact that the number 6 million already was widely used before WW2 and at least since 1915.

Thus completely proving false the scholarly belief that the term ‘6 million jews’ originated during and after world war 2 (

Now, we see the exact same happening, although “6 million” is not and cannot be used in order to keep the historical archives and the doctrine “accurate.”

“Jews in Ukraine fear for their lives,” “jews are on the run,” “jews are the target,” “jews have to register with the new authorities,” “jews need your help,” “it’s a disturbing time for jews in Europe right now.” This is exactly what was being written and published back in the 1900s BEFORE WW2!

  • The Jewish Federations: “The estimated 300,000 Jews living in Ukraine have been profoundly affected by the political and economic instability that have wracked the country. … The extremely volatile conflict has put many Jews and Jewish institutions in turbulent environments where personal and collective security is greatly at risk.
  • In light of the serious deterioration of conditions in Eastern Ukraine, the Jewish Federations of North America has reopened its Ukraine Assistance Fund. Contributions made via the Ukraine mailbox enable our partners to continue to fund essential programming to meet immediate and ongoing needs.”
  • Jerusalem Post: “Dahan, who heads the aliya department of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, then began to remind his listeners how the process of immigration to the Jewish state would unfold and added that they, as people who had fled from the civil war in eastern Ukraine, would be well taken care of in Israel. IFCJ, which raises money from a predominantly Christian donor base and has been involved in supporting Ukrainian Jewish institutions for years, had made arrangements with over 200 municipalities across Israel to ease the newcomers’ transition. … In light of the increased demands from Jews in Ukraine and elsewhere around the world to come with the IFCJ on aliya, we are increasing our number of flights from Ukraine to bring more Jews to safety in their new home, Israel. … Nearly 6,000 Jews immigrated to Israel from Ukraine last year, fleeing a Russian-backed insurgency. … Every generation has its own Exodus miracle.”
  • Jewish Agency for Israel: “Global Aliyah Up 55%, Due Largely to Increased Immigration from France, Ukraine … Aliyah Hits Ten-Year High: Approximately 26,500 New Immigrants Arrived in Israel in 2014 … Worldwide Aliyah up 32% compared to 2013. For the first time ever, more immigrants came from France than from any other country; Aliyah from Ukraine up 190% – nearly threefold – compared to last year.”
  • Times of Israel: “Jewish communities decimated in eastern Ukraine”
  • Times of Israel: “Frightened Ukrainian Jews flee to makeshift refugee camp”
  • Daily Mail: “Jews in Ukraine seeking escape to Israel over letter demanding they ‘register’ with pro-Russian forces”
  • Jerusalem Post: “Jews fear opposition’s anger might turn against them”
  • Jerusalem Post: “Jewish leader compares eastern Ukraine to Gaza … The pro-Russian insurgency in Ukraine’s Donbass region is our Gaza, one Ukrainian Jewish leader told”
  • Gawker: “Are Ukraine’s Jews Screwed? As a temporary government stands up in Kiev and all hell breaks loose with pro-Russian protesters in Crimea, the news is sounding grimmer and grimmer for Ukraine’s Jewish minority.”
  • World Jewish Relief: “Among crumbling Soviet era infrastructure, many of Ukraine’s Jews struggle to survive especially during the cold winter months.”
  • Chabad: “Due to the tense and volatile crisis in Ukraine, the Jewish population is living in a state of real fear.”
  • Jewish Federation of Silicon Valley: “Economic and political instability have profoundly affected the country’s more than 350,000 Jews. Thousands have been forced to flee their homes in eastern Ukraine—the first time Jews have been refugees in Europe since World War II.”
  • Jewish Federation of Columbus: “Jewish Lives Under Fire in Ukraine … While winter relief is a lifeline for tens of thousands of Jews who are in need in any given year, it’s even more essential this year in Ukraine”
  • Algeneiner: “What’s Next for Ukrainian Jews? Déjà vu, a horrible dream: Here we are in the 21st Century, and a civil war in Ukraine … elements on each side of the Russian-Ukrainian border have tried to use the “anti-Semitic” card against the other. … More than 250 Jewish refugees from Lugansk, and surrounding towns in Eastern Ukraine are slowly recuperating at the first Jewish refugee camp established in Ukraine.”
  • Boston Globe: “Crisis stirs old fears for Ukraine’s Jews”
  • Daily Express: “Jews urged to flee Ukraine. ALL Jewish people should leave Ukraine at once, a Holocaust survivor warned”
  • IB Times: “Jews Flee Mariupol Amid Fears Of Anti-Semitism In Ukraine”
  • The Blaze: “An Israeli newspaper is reporting that 70% of Ukraine’s Jewish community is now considering emigrating to Israel and that many are “flooding” the Israeli consulate to secure immigration visas in order to flee the country.”
  • Voice of America: “Crisis Puts Pressure on Ukraine’s Jews”
  • WND: “Jews preparing to evacuate Ukraine. Most of the Jews living in Ukraine are now filling out paperwork to prepare for emigration to Israel if necessary”
  • National Post: “Ukraine’s Jews caught in a propaganda war based on the ‘political manipulation of anti-Semitism’ … The context is not just the echo of Nazi Germany, but centuries of violence and scapegoating and singling out of Jews in Ukraine and in Russia.”

I could go on for quite some time but I’m sure that the point is made. The audiences of the above and numerous other media sources are constantly exposed to the same scripted narrative that everyone in the world should be worried about the jews, especially in Ukraine.

But as documented earlier, it is the people at the top of the Zionist food chain who themselves create this perception intentionally as part of the Zionist psyop in Ukraine.

I hope that in most cases the jewish people are not particularly aware of the broader scale of the true intentions of their community’s leaders and role models, although they should know because it is in the very synagogues that they frequent that rabbis like Shalom Lewis preach racism and give indications of their and the greater Israel lobby’s actual agenda.

Instigators like Lewis are nevertheless applauded and welcomed as heroes “for challenging times.”

On the other hand, it should also not surprise that western(-ized) media audiences are being deceived by the same jewish oligarchs such as Kolomoisky who have co-funded the “spontaneous” brown revolution in Ukraine, they, after all, own and control most of the Ukrainian mainstream media that is constantly being quoted by the western press [1, 2].

That fact is largely admitted even by Forbes – of all available outlets. Realizing this and it becomes quite clear what the actual purpose was of, for instance, the Ukrainian establishment press their reports that claimed that Russia was responsible for taking down flight MH17. Those reports were blindly parroted by practically all western press, both mainstream and “alternative.”

In addition to the constant propaganda of jews being the biggest victims of the Ukrainian brown revolution – brought upon them by their own Israel lobby that successfully manipulates US and EU foreign policies and by the Israeli government – there is another feature in this current Zionist psyop in Ukraine that is similar to the one that was rolled out before world war 2, at least since 1915.

In the printed press of those days it was, like now, also continuously stressed that jews on the run were in need of financial support from foreign governments and their electorate. Today, with the internet, that trend is being revived, but now the appeals are largely addressed at the people themselves. It is no longer required to have such calls being printed in the New York Times.

Now it is online that components from within the Israel lobby are asking for your money…

  • “Help Ukrainian Jews Come Home: Urgent Appeal for endangered Jews in the Ukraine”ICEJ
  • “Emergency Aid Ukraine: Please donate to help Jewish families in the Ukraine to prepare for their return to Israel!”Christians for Israel
  • “The UJA Jewish Ukraine Crisis Fund – Donate Now”CIJA
  • “Jewish Federations of North America Launches Ukraine Assistance Fund: Money Will Provide Security for Jewish Institutions”Forward

Ironically though, at the same time that donations are being collected, allegedly in name of the Ukrainian jews, the same groups and voices admit that “there are no reports of violence specifically targeting Jewish communities in Ukraine.”

If all of this isn’t clear evidence of a Zionist psyop taking place in Ukraine, then I don’t know what could possibly be more indicative.

To put it in contrast, it is assumed that jews represent 0.2% of the Ukrainian citizens, while islam is representing up to three times that percentage, 0.6%. Yet, I have not come across any calls for donations to help the Ukrainian muslims who would also be in danger given that they reside in the same country.

No, the only reports that make it to the frontpages regarding muslims in Ukraine are reports that promote the UNEI’s war on terror doctrine, that Al Qaeda or ISIS will soon reach Ukraine with their bomb vests.

Now, we all know who is responsible for the creation, funding and training of Al Qaeda and ISIS, which brings us back to the same governments who are responsible for facilitating the Zionist psychological operation in Ukraine, along with their favorite oligarchs and lobby.

So why is this so important to point out, this Zionist psyop?


Image result for holocaust psyop

Should we all want to avoid an additional layer of antisemitism accusations in relation to Ukraine and the ISIS false flags then it is crucial that we expose the facts for what they are before that extra layer can be applied to the doctrine of “6,000,000 jews,” a doctrine that is falling apart more and more every day.

More and more people know that the press in the 1900s, up to 20 years before the second world war even started officially, was already propagandizing the “six million jews” phrase and on top of that more and more people realize that it is odd – to say the least – that the accepted number of deadly victims in Auschwitz keeps on dropping year after year.

These are merely two indications that the officially recorded history is far from what the reality actually was and is and it is such false historical documentation that we have to avoid, in Ukraine. The future generations should not have to wait for the truth to come out 70+ years later after the facts.

How are we to accept as accurate the writings from 2,000 years ago when we can’t even trust what is being written today or a mere decade ago?

Why should we believe that the situation in Ukraine is just about war between NATO and Russia, while the facts prove that that narrative serves merely as a cover story for an ongoing Zionist psyop?