The Palestinians did not leave their homeland to invade anyone
The Zionists invaded Palestine
“The repression from Israel is the worst form of Apartheid. Nobody has the faintest idea of what is going on here, even the best informed people. Everything is in pieces, the land is destroyed and nothing else may be planted. All this smells like a boot camp, like Auschwitz. The israeli have turned into NAZI JEWS” , he declared after a visit to Palestina in March, 2002. prc.org.uk
The Haganah’s Operation Nahshon, designed to carve out a corridor to Jerusalem through this territory, which had been allotted to the Arab state under the partition plan, began on 6 April 1948.
It was the first operation within the framework of Plan Dalet, which aimed to enlarge the boundaries of the state allotted to the Zionists under the UN partition plan and simultaneously conquer dozens of villages from which the Palestinian Arab inhabitants would be expelled.
Benny Morris describes Operation Nahshon as “a watershed, characterized by an intention and effort to clear a whole area, permanently, of Arab villages and hostile or potentially hostile villagers.”
Yitzhak Rabin, then an officer in the Palmach’s Harel Brigade, had the mission of razing the Palestinian villages upon which ‘Abd al-Qadir al-Husayni relied for support, from Dayr Mahsir in the west to Kolonia and Kastel in the east.
Rabin later explained the ultimate goal of the operation as follows: “By not leaving stone on stone and driving all the people away, and without those villages, the Arab bands were not going to be able to operate effectively anymore.”
Dayr Yasin massacre
As their contribution to Operation Nahshon, Irgun and Lehi perpetrated the Dayr Yasin massacre on 9 April 1948.
The Haganah had prior knowledge of, and even assisted in, the attack on the village, strategically located one mile from Jerusalem’s western suburbs near the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv road.
The killings of the unarmed civilians after their surrender were gratuitously savage, and there were numerous instances of rape and, to quote a British police detective who investigated the massacre, other “sexual atrocities.”
Jacques de Reynier, Jerusalem’s chief delegate of the International Red Cross, reported that the Jewish forces carried out the attack “without any military reason or provocation of any kind.”
Indeed, Dayr Yasin was one of several Arab villages in the area that had concluded nonbelligerency agreements with Jewish Jerusalem. News of the attack spread quickly throughout Palestine.
De Reynier observed that the “general terror” was “astutely fostered by the Jews,” with Haganah radio incessantly repeating “Remember Dayr Yasin” and loudspeaker vans broadcasting messages in Arabic such as: “Unless you leave your homes, the fate of Dayr Yasin will be your fate.”
The massacre had an immediate impact on the situation in West Jerusalem. As Hala Sakakini of Qatamon wrote in her diary:
Lately, ever since the massacre at Dayr Yasin, we have been thinking seriously of leaving Jerusalem. The most terrible stories have been reached from eyewitnesses who have escaped from this unbelievable massacre…. One day, perhaps very soon, we may be forced to leave our house.
This home in Talbiyya, originally owned by Palestinian Hanna Bisharat, was taken over by the Israeli Foreign Ministry. It served as Golda Meir’s residence in 1968, when she made the infamous statement “There is no such thing as a Palestinian people.”
Despite the National Committee of Jerusalem’s order to the Arab population to stay put on pain of punishment, the massacre immediately provoked a mass flight of Palestinian Arabs from Jerusalem and the surrounding villages.
The impact of Dayr Yasin on the Arab neighborhood of Talbiyya is clearly rendered in the following testimony of an Israeli who witnessed its evacuation as a child:
I lived not far from here [Talbiyya]. Dayr Yasin had a huge influence on the evacuation of Talbiyya. The Arabs were scared to death. They left their meals on their tables and the Haganah requested people in our neighborhood to clean the houses so that Jews could move into them.
There were really meals still on the tables. The Arabs thought it was a matter of two or three days before they would return to their homes, as had happened in 1936 and 1939.
With Operation Nahshon having cleared the corridor leading to Jerusalem, the Haganah General Command was poised to take control of West Jerusalem excluding the areas under British control.
This was among the goals of Operation Yevussi, carried out by the Haganah’s Etzioni Brigade and Palmach units as of 27 April.
As a precursor to its attack on Qatamon, the Zionist forces subjected the neighborhood to weeks of heavy artillery shelling. On 22 April, the Arab National Committee of Jerusalem ordered its local branches to relocate all women, children, and elderly people from the neighborhoods.
The Haganah’s conquest of Qatamon on 1 May was followed by widespread looting. Hagit Shlonsky provides an eyewitness account:
I remember the looting in Qatamon very well. I was a first aid nurse stationed in the Beit Havra’a Etzion [military convalescence center] in Qatamon…. One night a soldier took me out and showed me around the neighborhood. I was stunned by the beauty of the houses. I went into one house-it was beautiful, with a piano, and carpets, and wonderful chandeliers.
Palestinian home in Qatamon
At the time my family lived in Rehavia on a street that was on the way to other Jewish neighborhoods from Qatamon. For days you could see people walking by carrying looted goods…. I saw them walking by for days.
Not only soldiers, civilians as well. They were looting like mad. They were even carrying dining tables. And it was in broad daylight, so everyone could see….
In our family, because my father was so outraged by the looting, we all talked about it a lot. But otherwise I didn’t hear about it from anybody. It took many years till people started all talking and writing about it.
On 16 May, the Zionist forces took over Baq’a, an event described in the memoirs of John Rose, an Armenian Jerusalemite:
There was no resistance of any sort; they just walked in, gradually taking over buildings in strategic places. Nearly every house was empty: set tables with plates of unfinished food indicated that the occupants had fled in disarray, haste, and fear.
In some kitchens cooking stoves had been left alight, reducing the ingredients of a waiting meal to blackened remains.
After the fall of the Arab neighborhoods of West Jerusalem, only about 750 non-Jews remained in the area. Of these, many were Greeks who were allowed to continue living in their houses in the German Colony and the Greek Colony.
Almost all the Arabs-most of whom were Christian-were concentrated by the Zionist forces into Upper Baq’a.
Meanwhile, Operation Kilshon (“Pitchfork”) had begun on 14 May, the day before the British Mandate was to end, and was designed to occupy the areas that had been controlled by the British, particularly Talbiyya and central Jerusalem.
Looting ‘Ayn Karim by newly arrived persecuted European Jews 1948
Complicity of British troops helped ensure this operation’s success. Through coordinating their withdrawal, the British handed over to the Haganah “Bevingrad,” the huge central compound consisting of the city’s vital installations.
They also secured the Haganah’s occupation of the strategically positioned Villa Harun al-Rashid in Talbiyya, which served as the command base for the Royal Air Force and which towered over the neighborhood.
With control of this central area extending beyond Bevingrad to Musrara, Jewish forces now occupied all of West Jerusalem.
THE ARAB LEGION
With Ben-Gurion’s declaration on 14 May of the establishment of Israel, the Jewish state in Palestine, with no specified borders, Transjordan-along with Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria-decided to attack.
Two days later, Jordan’s well-trained Arab Legion, officered by the British and under the command of Glubb Pasha, arrived on the outskirts of Jerusalem.
At first, Glubb resisted the calls for help from the local Palestinians, under attack from Zionist forces, which had breached the walls of the Old City in an effort to link up with the Hagannah garrison in the Jewish Quarter under siege by the Palestinians.
Only after strong Arab pressure and desperate cries for help from the local population did King ‘Abdallah order Glubb to advance into Jerusalem on 19 May.
It was the entry, however reluctant, of King ‘Abdallah’s troops that prevented the Zionist forces from completing their progressive takeover of the city.
‘Abdallah’s secret arrangement with the Zionists concerning the division of Palestine has been amply documented, but since the UN plan had designated Jerusalem a corpus separatum, it was not covered by the deal.
Avi Shlaim believes that fighting between the Transjordanian and Israeli forces broke out in and around Jerusalem precisely because the two sides had not reached an understanding regarding the city.
This is not the place to rehearse the fierce fighting over the Old City, which by the end of May was completely under Arab control, or the intense disappointment of the Arab soldiers of the Legion who were prevented by their British superiors from attacking West Jerusalem.
At the end of May, Britain ended all Arab hopes of pressing forward by withdrawing all its Arab Legion officers-two-thirds of the total-from the fighting in Jerusalem and imposing a regional arms embargo that favored the Israelis.
For their part, the Israelis in West Jerusalem were under renewed siege and constant bombardment by the Arab Legion. On 11 June, both sides agreed to a thirty-day truce.
Some Jewish residents of West Jerusalem used the cease-fire as an opportunity to loot more empty Arab houses. John Rose, one of the few non-Jews who had remained in West Jerusalem, reported:
Our movements were restricted, but Jewish residents from the western suburbs and elsewhere were allowed to circulate freely. During this time looting of Arab houses started on a fantastic scale, accompanied by wholesale vindictive destruction of property.
First it was the army who broke into the houses, searching for people and for equipment that they could use. Next came those in search of food, after which valuables and personal effects were taken.
From our veranda we saw horse-drawn carts as well as pick-up trucks laden with pianos, refrigerators, radios, paintings, ornaments and furniture, some wrapped in valuable Persian carpets…. Safes with money and jewelry were pried open and emptied.
Jews with children : ” a’looting we will go”
The loot was transported for private use or for sale in West Jerusalem. To us this was most upsetting. Our friends’ houses were being ransacked, and we were powerless to intervene.
. . . This state of affairs continued for months. Latecomers made do with what remained to be pillaged. They pried off ceramic tiles from bathroom walls and removed all electric switches and wiring, kitchen gadgets, water-pipes and fittings. Nothing escaped: lofts and cellars were broken into, doors and windows hacked down, floor tiles removed in search of hidden treasures. 
Meanwhile, Palestinian Arabs in the Old City, including many who had been displaced from West Jerusalem, used the lull in the fighting to escape to safer areas. Their flight and the consequent desolation visited upon the Old City is described in the diaries of Greek vice consul in Jerusalem, C. X. Mavrides:
What characterized more the Old City during the four weeks of the truce was the exodus of the noncombatant population from the city who took refuge in the countryside, the surrounding villages and towns such as Ramallah, Jericho and Bethlehem, or Transjordan.
From morning till evening the streets were full of porters and pack-animals, belonging to the Ta’amreh and A’bed tribes, who were carrying furniture, household utensils, mattresses, clothing, etc., from different parts of the city and heading to Damascus Gate.
The exodus was like an ongoing chain of animals, porters, women, aged people, children-all of them carrying something under the burning July sun. As the time limit for the “truce” was approaching, this chain of people and animals was getting denser and denser every day.
On Friday, 10 July, as the truce had expired (8:00 A.M.), the Old City became empty of population. Out of a population of 60,000 plus the nearly 10,000 refugees who came from the new city suburbs, it is estimated that today about 5,000 to 7,000 only remain. Most of them are very poor, and they have absolutely no money at all to move away.
At the end of the cease-fire, IDF and Arab Legion cannons exchanged furious gunfire inside Jerusalem, and the Israeli troops launched a final abortive attack on the Old City.
With the artillery brought in during the cease-fire, the IDF shelled the Old City intensely, inflicting extensive damage but this time causing a low casualty rate because so many had fled.
By then, the Palestinians viewed the Arab Legion with a large measure of skepticism, as related by John Rose:
The stalemate was intriguing and the intensity of fruitless daily bombing aroused suspicion. Rumors soon spread that perhaps after all there was a secret agreement between the sides and that the noise we heard was only a sideshow for the benefit of the population.
The Arab Legion was accused of using ammunition filled with bran and sawdust intended to cause minimum damage to the enemy.
THE SETTLING OF ARAB WEST JERUSALEM
On 17 July 1948, after a week of fighting, a second UN-arranged cease-fire went into effect in Jerusalem. By then, the city was effectively divided into the Israeli-controlled West and the Transjordanian-controlled East.
A belt of no-man’s land ran south from Shaykh Jarrah, along the west side of the Old City’s walls, and down Hebron Road to Ramat Rahel. The next month, Israel’s provisional government declared West Jerusalem “territory occupied by the State of Israel” subject to Israeli law.
The state used the Absentee Property Regulations of 1948 to confiscate all Arab homes, including any contents that had not already been looted, as well as lands and businesses.
These regulations, later codified as the Absentee Property Law of 1950, allowed all property belonging to an “absentee” to be transferred to the Custodian of Absentee Property.
An “absentee” was defined as a person who, at any time between 29 November 1947 and the day on which the state of emergency declared in 1948 ceases to exist, became a national or citizen of an Arab country, visited an Arab country, or left his ordinary place of residence in Palestine “for a place outside Palestine before 1 September 1948.”
The status of the custodian, according to the law, is the same “as was that of the owner of the property,” enabling him to choose to maintain the property, sell it, or lease it.
Even before the first cease-fire in June, the Housing Committee began settling Israeli Jews in elegant Palestinian neighborhoods such as Qatamon and the German Colony.
It was not until September, however, that this policy was carried out systematically. New immigrants, the first category of Israelis to be settled, were housed in the German Colony, Qatamon, Baq’a, Musrara, Dayr Abu Tur, and Talbiyya.
Arnon Golan writes that the policy was not so much a result of the lack of alternative housing as a political strategy:
The population by Jews of former Arab neighborhoods was supposed to create facts on the ground, after which it would be difficult to alter them in the framework of a political agreement.
New immigrants, so very dependent, were the government’s and the Jewish Agency’s primary reserve for housing these neighborhoods.
Internal Israeli politics also played a role in the resettlement. Again according to Golan, the ruling Mapai party, whose standing was weak among the veteran Jewish population of Jerusalem, was eager to move immigrants into the city to strengthen its position there.
To encourage them to settle in Jerusalem where conditions were relatively difficult, the Israeli government provided incentives, such as exemption from army service.
So zealously did the Jewish Agency settle new immigrants in Palestinians’ houses that its officials clashed with those of the Custodian.
Not only did the Jewish Agency misreport to the Custodian concerning the Arab houses in which it was settling new immigrants, but it also took property without authorization from these homes and handed it over to the Jewish Agency’s New Immigrant Authority.
The new immigrants, for their part, were more than willing to move into the spacious Palestinian homes.
So much so that when immigrants were told that they would be housed in the Jewish neighborhood of Neve Sha’anan, some refused to move there, saying they preferred to live in the villas of Qatamon.
As the new immigrants flooded into West Jerusalem, an acute housing crisis developed. On 15 September 1948, Military Governor Dov Joseph reported that 5,000 Jews in West Jerusalem needed housing.
As Qatamon and the German Colony already were overcrowded, Jews began to be housed in Baq’a and the Greek Colony. Many of those lacking housing grew impatient and broke into and squatted in empty houses in Qatamon.
Other squatters had housing elsewhere but simply wanted to improve their living conditions by moving into the more spacious Arab homes.
According to Golan, among the squatters were Israeli officers who broke into Arab buildings and arbitrarily took apartments for themselves.
Some soldiers had two apartments: one in the city center and one in Arab neighborhoods, which they rented out for considerable sums. By early 1950, the Israeli housing authorities authorized almost all the squatters, soldier and civilian, to remain in the Palestinian homes they had broken into.
Newly arrived persecuted European Jews strolling in Jaffa, 1949
Throughout the process of Israeli settlement, looting remained a problem, as reported by the military governor of Jerusalem, Dov Joseph, in a letter to Ben-Gurion:
The looting is spreading once again…. I cannot verify all the reports which reach me, but I get the distinct impression that the commanders are not over-eager to catch and punish the thieves…. I receive complaints every day
. By way of example, I enclose a copy of a letter I received from the manager of the Notre Dame de France. Behavior like this in a monastery can cause quite serious harm to us
. I’ve done my best to put a stop to the thefts there, which are all done by soldiers, since civilians are not permitted to enter the place. But as you can see from this letter, these acts are continuing. I am powerless. 
In mid-September 1948, the Israeli military erected a barbed-wire fence around a half-square-mile area in Baq’a, where they further concentrated the Palestinian Arabs who had remained in West Jerusalem.
During daylight hours, they were permitted to roam around the compound, but at night they were under curfew. Israeli marauders broke through the fence to steal what they could from the “non-Jews.”
Newly arrived Bulgarian Jews in the ethnically cleansed Palestinian village of al-Bassa, 1950. via
In addition, gangs of Israeli soldiers burst into the houses on the pretext that they were looking for “hidden arms and Arabs” and proceeded to extort money, jewelry, and other valuables.
Because of the housing shortage, some Jews defied the military authorities’ separation policy and rented rooms from non-Jews in the concentration zone.
It was not until November 1949 that the restrictions on movement of the Palestinians confined to the Baq’a zone were lifted, and they were permitted to circulate in West Jerusalem.
They were issued Israeli identity cards and, together with the villagers of divided Bayt Safafa on the Israeli side of the armistice lines, constituted the small Palestinian Arab minority of West Jerusalem.
The Custodian of Absentee Property confiscated the homes of many Arabs in the Baq’a zone and forced them to pay rent to the Israeli state. Rose recorded the confiscation of his aunt’s property in Baq’a as follows:
This [Absentee Property] law finally caught up with Aunt Arousiag and she was informed by the Custodian of Enemy Property that she had no rights in the house.
She was to be treated as a tenant, and a demand for rent was sent to her for the two rooms which she occupied; furthermore, rents collected by her were to be handed over to the Custodian.
The owner had been her late brother, Hagop…. She had lived there since it was built by her brother at the turn of the century, and had ploughed most of her earnings into the building. Unfortunately her pleas fell on deaf ears.
AFTER THE WAR
The formal cessation of hostilities between Israel and the Arab states at the end of November 1948 allowed the expansion of Jewish settlement into Jerusalem’s Arab neighborhoods that hitherto had been military zones.
Israel stepped up settlement further in defiant reaction to UNGA Resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, Paragraph 11 of which called for the return of refugees to their homes; the resolution also reaffirmed the corpus separatum for Jerusalem.
Four days later, Jerusalem Military Governor Dov Joseph reported to the Governor’s Council that, in order to counter the UN refusal to include Jerusalem in the State of Israel’s borders, he had ordered the immediate expansion of Jewish housing areas into territories abandoned by Arabs that thus far had not been populated by Jews.
The first such area to be settled was the vicinity of the commercial center in Mamilla.
The original Mamilla Street extended from the Mamilla Pool to Jaffa Gate. Along this street, wealthy Arabs constructed homes, offices and stores in the 1800s. Toward the end of the 19th century, the street became a fashionable commercial district. Both Arab and Jewish businessmen operated high-end shops for furniture, textiles, housewares, art, photography, and automobile showrooms.
On 2 February 1949, the Israeli government declared that it no longer considered West Jerusalem as occupied territory and abolished military rule.
That same month, Israel and Transjordan began negotiations over Jerusalem and the rest of the territory along their front lines. Throughout the negotiations, the Israelization of West Jerusalem proceeded.
To lessen the scope of potential Israeli compromises in the event of a peace agreement, Moshe Dayan ordered that the frontier neighborhood of Dayr Abu Tur be settled, together with Talpiot and Ramat Rachel.
Dayan’s directive was designed to preempt pressure on Israel from the UN-chaired armistice commission to relinquish control over the southern Jerusalem-Bethlehem road.
As happened in other Arab neighborhoods that were opened up to settlement, buildings and homes in the Dayr Abu Tur area were looted.
Meanwhile, Israel as of early 1949 had begun transferring government offices from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. A major aspect of the transfer was the relocation of thousands of government clerks, who received preferential treatment in the allocation of housing.
On 12 April 1949, a high-level government meeting was held in the Israeli Defense Ministry to discuss the housing of government clerks in Jerusalem.
It was decided that 400 apartment units be allocated to the clerks and that they be given priority in choosing apartments in the neighborhoods of Baq’a, the German Colony, and the Greek Colony.
Shaul Avigur, one of Ben-Gurion’s closest advisers, was to be the absolute arbitrator in any dispute. As part of settling and resettling new immigrants in alternative sites, the Absorption Department was granted authority over Musrara and Lower Lifta.
Following this decision, new immigrants were allocated housing only in neighborhoods reserved for government clerks in those apartments that were in such bad shape that the cost of renovation was too high.
Houses in the elegant neighborhood of Talbiyya were reserved exclusively for senior officials and those with important connections, such as judges and professors at Hebrew University.
Out of political considerations, though, government clerks were sometimes placed in less desirable neighborhoods. Clerks of the Ministry of Provisioning and Rationing were housed in Dayr Abu Tur, adjacent to the demarcation line.
These houses were in terrible condition due to the intense fighting that had been waged in the neighborhood, and there still existed a danger of sniper fire. Still, a decision was taken to house the clerks in Dayr Abu Tur because of Israel’s goal to settle Jews throughout the full area of Jerusalem under its control.
Many of these clerks requested to be rehoused in Qatamon where the expansive houses were in better condition. In the end, senior-ranking officials succeeded in being housed in Qatamon, while regular clerks remained in Dayr Abu Tur.
To provide for the ever-increasing number of Jewish residents in Jerusalem, the Israeli government opened many new schools and health service facilities, mostly in buildings owned by Palestinians.
The Histadrut opened dozens of schools in Musrara, Baq’a, the German Colony, and ‘Ayn Karim. To stimulate Jewish Jerusalem’s economy, new small industries and businesses were given special loans to lure them to the city.
The Custodian of Absentee Property handed over many buildings to be renovated for workshops, mostly in Mamilla, while additional ones were set up in the German Colony and the Greek Colony. 
While these activities had been proceeding, Israel made its second application for UN membership in late February 1949.
After the Security Council rejected its first application for admission on 17 December 1948, Abba Eban, Israel’s UN representative, repeatedly assured the UNGA that his government intended to comply with the resolutions pertaining to Jerusalem.
Testifying before the UN’s Ad Hoc Political Committee after concern was expressed about the transfer of government offices to Jerusalem, Eban assured them that “No juridical facts whatever were created by such steps, which were dictated not by a desire to create new political facts, but to assist Jerusalem and to add economic recovery to the other aspects of its splendid recuperation.”
He also reassured the committee that “the legal status of Jerusalem is different from that of the territory in which Israelis sovereign.”
He even claimed that the holding of the first Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem ten days earlier was based solely on “an historical motive which had nothing whatever to do with the future status of Jerusalem.”
Jews looting Palestinian properties.
Whether or not the United Nations was convinced by Eban’s arguments, Israel was admitted as a new member on 11 May 1949, with the UNGA placing on the record Israel’s “declarations and explanations” regarding the implementation of Resolutions 181 and 194 .
On 13 December, almost seven months to a day after having been admitted to the UN, and several days after yet another UNGA resolution, 303(IV), was passed calling for the internationalization of the city, the Knesset voted officially to declare Jerusalem Israel’s capital and accelerated the transfer of government offices to the city.
By the end of May 1949, all of West Jerusalem’s Arab districts had been settled, at least to some extent, by Jews, most of them new immigrants.
Henry Cattan estimates that, in all, Israel occupied some 10,000 Arab homes, mostly fully furnished, in West Jerusalem.
Meanwhile, in East Jerusalem, some 7,500 Palestinian refugees from West Jerusalem (out of the total of almost 30,000), including Qatamon, Upper and Lower Baq’a, and Musrara, were living either in the open or temporarily housed in mosques, convents, schools, and Old City houses in ruinous conditions.
Consistent with its stated goal of retaining the “reunified” city of Jerusalem as its “eternal capital,” Israel has settled over 170,000 Israeli Jews on expropriated Palestinian land in East Jerusalem but has not permitted a single Palestinian to return to his or her home in West Jerusalem.