2017 is the year of sad anniversaries for Palestinians

100 Years of Pro-Israel Activism: How a Special Interest Lobby Enabled the Colonization of Palestine. If Americans Knew!

2017 is the year of anniver­saries for Palestinians. Sadly, none can be celebrated.

The first of these will be May 15th — the 69th an­niversary of the catastrophe, known as the Nakba when Israel was cre­ated in the Palestinian homeland without their permission. It also marks the period when 750,000 Palestinians were driven out to neighboring countries by Zionist gangs and Israeli armed forces.

Early June brings the 50th an­niversary of the six-day war, when Israel captured the remainder of historic Palestine, the Syrian Golan Heights and the Egyptian Sinai. While Sinai was returned to Egypt, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights remain occupied. This occupation is seen as illegal by the international community. Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem and the Golan is not recognized by any other country.

Related image

Israeli armored troop unit entering Gaza during the Six-Day War, June 6

June also marks the tenth anni­versary of Israel’s blockade on Gaza.

In November, two events that ir­revocably changed the future of his­toric Palestine will be marked. No­vember 29th is the 70th anniversary of the UN General Assembly passing Resolution 181, which recommend­ed the partition of Palestine at the end of the British Mandate.

Related image

In practice, Zionists did not accept the UN Partition Plan. Zionists seized areas beyond the proposed Jewish State and did not recognize the International Zone. Using force and terrorism months before May 1948, Jews seized land beyond the UN proposed borders. The UN Plan was used as a pretense for taking over most of Palestine.

NOTE: This is a critical fact often omitted when the history is presented and this leads to a very distorted view of what happened in 1948. The misleading story often told is that “Jews declared Israel and then they were attacked.” The fact is from November 1947 to May 1948 the Zionists were already on the offensive and had already attacked Arabs.

In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had driven 300,000 non-Jews off their land. In the months before Israel was declared, the Zionists had seized land beyond the proposed Jewish State. SEE Sources or this blog entry: Sources for the Israeli/Palestinian situation 1947-1948

November 2nd is perhaps the most significant anniversary. This year marks the centenary of what the Balfour declaration, the letter from British Foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild of the Zionist Federation in which he stated:

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

The declaration was made before Britain was given the mandate on Palestine and without any consulta­tion with the indigenous popula­tion of Palestine. Through this, Britain prom­ised a land it did not have to a people who did not live on it without consulting those whose land it was.

Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Dushinsky, Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem (1867-1948) “We wish to express our definite opposition to a Jewish state in any part of Palestine.”

Last December, in a speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, British Prime Minister Theresa May referred to the Balfour declaration as “one of the most important let­ters in history” and that “it demon­strates Britain’s vital role in creating a homeland for the Jewish people”. She said “it is an anniversary we will be marking with pride”.

Image result for Balfour's original sin

 

In his address to the UN General Assembly in 2016, Palestinian Presi­dent Mahmoud Abbas stated: “We ask Great Britain, as we approach 100 years since this infamous declaration, to draw the necessary lessons and to bear its historic, legal, political, material and moral responsibility for the consequences of this declara­tion, including an apology to the Palestinian people for the catastrophes, misery and injus­tice this declaration created and to act to rectify these disasters and remedy its consequences, includ­ing by the recognition of the state of Palestine…This is the least Great Britain can do.”

It seems Abbas’s words fell on deaf ears. Not only has Britain refused to apologize, May recently rolled out the Downing Street red carpet for Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

In the meantime, Israel continues to violate UN resolutions with im­punity and Palestinians can expect more bad anniversaries to mark.

Image result for king netanyahu

source

Occupation Zionist leader calls for demolition of homes belonging to Native Palestinian ‘arsonists’

Related image

Palestine before foreign occupation

Image result for palestinians before zionism

Zionist Occupation of Palestine

  Israel’s ultra right Education Minister Naftali Bennett used the occasion to point blame at Palestinians for the devastating fire, saying that “only someone who this land does not belong to would be capable of setting fire to it,” implying both that Palestinians were responsible for the fires and that Palestinians do not have any attachment to the land in Israel, where some 700,000 Palestinians were displaced from during the establishment of foreign conceived Israel in 1948.

Israeli Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan Saturday called for the demolition of homes of any Palestinian found guilty of arson, according to Israeli media.

Several Israeli news sites quoted Erdan as saying that “If you can demolish a home of a terrorist who opens fire or stabs, then you should demolish the home of nationally-motivated arsonist as well. There is no difference.”

According to a statement released Saturday by the spokeswoman of the Israeli police, Luba al-Samri, at least 23 Palestinian “suspects” have been detained over suspicions of arson or “incitement,” adding that Israeli police have so far questioned some 30 “suspected arsonists.”

The mass fire ripping through Israel first erupted in Haifa and saw tens of thousands of residents forced to flee their homes, while wildfires also spread across the occupied West Bank, from the northern district of Nablus to Hebron in the southern West Bank.
Israeli authorities have claimed that the fires were started by “political arson” against the Israeli state. However, other sources have said the fires were likely caused by a combination of extreme winds and a drought.
Meanwhile, other critics have claimed that Israeli politicians were quick to blame Palestinians for the fires as a political maneuver to further convince the international community of Palestinian hostility toward the Israeli state.
One Israeli journalist, Meron Rapoport, wrote for Middle East Eye that “the wave of fires has certainly shown how ready the Israeli leadership is to use any opportunity to portray the Palestinian minority as the enemy within, without waiting for evidence or even trying to pretend that it seeks cooperation with its 1.5 million Arab citizens.”
On Thursday, according to the Times of Israel, Israel’s ultra right Education Minister Naftali Bennett used the occasion to point blame at Palestinians for the devastating fire, saying that “only someone who this land does not belong to would be capable of setting fire to it,” implying both that Palestinians were responsible for the fires and that Palestinians do not have any attachment to the land in Israel, where some 700,000 Palestinians were displaced from during the establishment of Israel in 1948.
Other Israeli leaders have also added to the chorus, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stating on Thursday that any Palestinian guilty of arson would have their Israeli residency revoked.
 
Meanwhile, the Joint List — Palestinian members of the Israeli parliament — and the Fatah movement of the occupied West Bank condemned Palestinians who have celebrated the fires for revenge over thebanning of the adhan — the Muslim call to prayer — while Palestinian civil defense crews have provided reinforcement in order to assist Israel in controlling the fires in Haifa and Jerusalem.
 
Israeli forces routinely carry out punitive home demolitions on families of Palestinians who have attacked or believed to have attacked Israeli civilians or military personnel, as Netanyahu fast-tracked punitive home demolitions in an effort to “deter” attacks carried out by Palestinian individuals in the wake of a wave of violence that has swept across the West Bank since last October.
The move came despite past recommendations by an Israeli military committee that the practice did not deter attacks. Israeli rights group B’Tselem has condemned the practice as “court-sanctioned revenge” carried out on family members who have not committed crimes, amounting to collective punishment.
“When one thinks that this is what is necessary for Israel to survive, that the Zionist dream is based on the repeated slaughter of innocents on a scale that is really a profound, profound crisis — and should be a profound crisis in the thinking of all of us who were committed to the establishment of the state and to its success.” Rabbi Henry Siegman

 

US Congressmen blast anti-Israel UNESCO resolution distorting European Jewish fake history

In 1996, Bill Clinton remarked privately after his first meeting with Bibi, “Who the fuck does he think he is? Who’s the fucking superpower here?”

The reason the temple was not built on top of the Gihon Spring is the same reason
people do not put a toilet in the middle of the kitchen table where food is eaten.
Furthermore, anyone who has personally visited the Gihon Spring knows there
simply is not enough room in the “City of David” for the temple platform.
bible.ca/archeology

Image result for gov zionist agents

AGENTS OF A FOREIGN STATE – Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) at their meeting on July 7, 2010, in Jerusalem.Ehud Barak is one of the high-level architects of the 9-11 deception that took America to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

American lawmakers on Thursday condemned UNESCO’s passing of a resolution denying any Jewish connection to the Temple Mount and the Western Wall in Jerusalem.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said UNESCO had “doubled down on its reflexive anti-Israel bias by voting for yet another resolution that deliberately distorts history and denies the specific connection of the [European new immigrants] Jewish people to Jerusalem going back [absurdly] thousands of years.

Image result for jews against zionism

“Zionism was established by a certain man who was a journalist in Austria: Theodore Herzl. He made Zionism! And he didn’t believe in G-d!” Rabbi Mordechai Gifter, Rosh Yeshiva of Telshe Yeshiva

“It is unfortunate that the U.S. Mission to UNESCO could not do more to persuade our allies to oppose this disgraceful resolution, the real purpose of which is to undermine Jerusalem’s identity as the capital [not] of the Jewish State,” he continued.

Cruz called on Congress to “redouble its efforts to counter these pernicious attempts to falsely attack and delegitimize our close ally through international institutions by continuing to withhold funding from entities that participate in such activities, and reaffirm our commitment to stand unshakably with Israel.”

Netanyahu and Cruz meet in Jerusalem

Know your traitors!

On Tuesday, Cruz and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) led a bipartisan, bicameral letter to members of the Executive Board of UNESCO urging opposition to this resolution.

Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who had joined the initiative by Cruz and Ros-Lehtinen also condemned the passage of the resolution.

“I am outraged by the actions of the UNESCO Executive Board today in passing a resolution that is blatantly anti-Semitic and obviously revisionist as it seeks to eliminate all Jewish ties to the holiest site in Judaism, the Temple Mount,” said Nadler.

Image result for palestinian christians

Palestinians know who they are and what country they live in!

“By declaring the site as solely sacred for Muslims, and utterly ignoring the indisputable Jewish and Christian ties, this resolution is fundamentally ahistorical. It willfully disregards historical facts in the pursuit of an anti-Semitic agenda from a body that routinely demonstrates an unfair bias against Israel,” he continued.

Image result for jews and muslims were friends

The difference between a real Jew and an immigrant fake Jew.

“Without consideration for the Temple Mount’s significance in Judaism, UNESCO has engaged in an outrageous assault on the history of the [European, non-semitic] Jewish people and the history of Jerusalem, and for that matter, the origins of Christianity [no one questions Christian origin] .

I applaud the [Zio] United States for leading the opposition to this resolution, and for demonstrating—yet again—the importance of America’s leadership on the international stage in standing against such attacks,” Nadler concluded.

The resolution was supported by 24 states, including Russia and China. 6 countries opposed and 26 abstained.

The resolution maintains that the Western Wall and Temple Mount will be referred to by their Arabic names and the Hebrew terms for the sites will only appear in quotation marks in UN references.

Israeli officials blasted the resolution, with Polish Prime Minister Binyamin Mileikowsky-Netanyahu saying, “The UNESCO theater show goes on. Today it took a ridiculous decision denying the connection between the Jewish people and the Western Wall.

“It’s like saying that the Chinese have no connection to the Great Wall of China and the Egyptians have no connection to the pyramids,” added Netanyahu. [The Chinese are really Chinese and the Egyptians are really Egyptians!]

Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein also spoke out against the UN, saying that the UN is “disconnected from reality and history.”

In contrast, Palestinian Authority (PA) officials welcomed the passing of the resolution, claiming it sends a message to Israel that it must end its “occupation” and recognize a Palestinian state with eastern Jerusalem as its capital.

 

Elite Control of Society Has Fractured

What has taken place is significant and irreversible.
Wars and government control are being rejected by a strong substrata of US citizens, and of the West generally. The ability of elites to use propaganda and “directed history” to achieve their goals is waning. What is left is outright force. Short-term this is a terrible but viable solution. Long-term it is not.


Military attacks and terrorist attacks on the surface of the Earth are caused by world Zionism, through NATO, GRU, CIA, Mossad, SAS, FSB-KGB, DST, MAD, Cesis and others, economic and political destabilization for Colonization HEBREW worldwide.

thedailybell.com/October 10-12 2016
“The West is run by an unelected banking caste that has globalization as its goal. Sociopolitical, economic and military events are created via Western intelligence agencies, mainly in the US, Britain and Israel, to further formal [Hebrew] internationalism.”

Schieffer: Presidential Debate ‘Was Just Disgraceful’ … Bob Schieffer was not a fan of Sunday night’s presidential debate.   -CBS

Bob Schieffer, CBS news contributor and former “Face the Nation” host made news for calling the most recent presidential debate “disgraceful.”

But the debate was more predictable than disgraceful.

The United States was formed in part because Europe had had enough of war and, post Gutenberg Press, people were increasingly resistant to control. But now history is repeating itself. People in the US, like Europe are increasingly resistant to war and overt government manipulation that reduces rather than enhances their prosperity.

The problem that elites have is that there is really nowhere else to go. If they cannot launch serial wars from the US something more must be done.

Elites keep control via economic depression and military conflict. But every once in a while the incremental debasement and serial warfare is not enough. More is needed.

This is why mankind now faces larger wars, perhaps a world war, and why economic debasement is going to turn into lethal, raging ruin.

With only four weeks to the election, Republican politicians don’t have any good choices left. But whatever happens in the meantime, perhaps they’ll learn that there are worse consequences than angering their strongest supporters

Yet another inaccurate statement from our perspective. The GOP’s disgruntled supporters are not merely the strongest; they are also are the most numerous. And they have their counterparts among Democrats.

Step back and view what has really taken place. Consensus politics is finished. The ability of US leaders to inflict policies supporting globalization on behalf of City bankers has shriveled.

Wars and government control are being rejected by a strong substrata of US citizens, and of the West generally. This is why we forecast increased confrontation. To suggest, as this Bloomberg article does, that this rising wave of repugnance is somehow ephemeral is inaccurate.

These days, one could describe the US as a serial monarchy but it is even worse than that because the control evidently resides with the Western banking establishment located in the City of London. Thus the presidential candidates are merely ciphers whose electability rests on their ability to implement orders from abroad.

We’ve mentioned this many times over the past two decades, as have others (more today than yesterday). The West is run by an unelected banking caste that has globalization as its goal. Sociopolitical, economic and military events are created via Western intelligence agencies, mainly in the US, Britain and Israel, to further formal [Hebrew]  internationalism.

Image result for dressed as jews but not jews they are fake jews

The idea, eventually, is apparently to form a strong world government. Also, likely, to initiate a kind of genocide … if the Georgia Guidestones are to be believed. These call for a reduction of population to approximately 500 million. See here.

Within this context, it is hard to accept Schieffer’s description of the most recent debate as “disgraceful.” The debates are what they are. They are an extension of trends going back to the formation of the Constitution itself, and even earlier.

“How have we come to this? This is supposed to be a campaign for the most powerful office of the land. Here we’re marching in women into the hall who supposed to have some relationship with one of the candidate’s spouses … “I mean this is what they do in Banana Republic. This is the United States of America.  “I just hope to God I don’t see another campaign like this one. America can do better than what we have seen here tonight. This was just disgraceful,” Schieffer said.

Does Schieffer really believe this? What exactly is he upset about? Perhaps he is concerned because the current federal election is revealing more of the actual reality of the US rather than what the topmost elements of modern domestic society wish to have presented.

But even this is probably not correct. Modern elections are stage-managed affairs and the current production is probably being presented to the American people purposefully. It is not a coincidence.  Those at the very top have obviously made a decision that US voters are to be exposed to an election that shakes their faith in the American process itself to produce viable leadership.

The idea, gradually but definitively, is to reduce people’s belief in the credibility of their institutions. The election has not merely made a mockery of the political system, it has also further undermined the credibility of US and Western media. And none of this is by happenstance.

Honestly, what is a disgrace is that Schieffer may actually believe his characterization of the US and its current elections. How can an elderly man who has operated at the center of the US media structure be sincerely indignant about what is occurring? Perhaps he is merely commenting as part of a larger campaign of disinformation but he sounds sincerely upset

Schieffer’s attitude may in fact reveal a larger truth about the current US – and Western – system, which has evolved as it has in part because of the people’s innate ability to fool themselves about the realities in which they participate.

Netanyahu, the Grand Mufti and the Holocaust, the real History

Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Dushinsky, Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem (1867-1948)
“We wish to express our definite opposition to a Jewish state in any part of Palestine.”

 

And so he [the Jew] advances on his fatal road until another force comes forth to oppose him, and in a mighty struggle hurls the heaven-stormer back to Lucifer. Germany is today the next great war aim of Bolshevism. It requires all the force of a young missionary idea to raise our people up again, to free them from the snares of this international serpent…
-Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

In a speech to the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem on October 20, the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu- Mileikowsky accused Haj Amin al-Husseini, former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, of “inspiring the Holocaust” and urging Hitler to exterminate the Jewish people.

Netanyahu- Mileikowsky then explained that he wanted “to show that the father of the Palestinian nation wanted to destroy Jews even without occupation.” It’s too late for this fantasy, however. Israel’s cult following is reduced to fringe nuts, war profiteers and opportunists. These comments led to widespread condemnation and outrage. But who was al-Husseini, and what was his role and involvement in the Holocaust?

Who was the Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini?

Born in the mid-1890s, and appointed Mufti of Jerusalem in 1921 (Grand Mufti in 1922), Haj Amin al-Husseini was one of the most prominent nationalist Arab figures in Palestine during the time of the British Mandate. He opposed both British rule in Palestine, and the British Rothschild’s conspiracy to establish a sovereign  international criminal haven of non-Semitic Jews.

His concern for his country and people led him to organize and support protests against European immigration and European settlements, which peaked in the 1936-39 Arab revolt in Palestine. They were not considered Jews even by the Palestinian Jews.

unreported by media, Palestinians Jews, Christians and Muslims have never stopped protesting the European occupation

Al-Husseini had welcomed the Nazi seizure of power in Germany in 1933 in opposition of the British Balfore declaration and the Zionist conspiracy to over run Palestine with Europeans, requesting that no European foreign “Jews” be sent to Palestine. He sought an alliance between the Arab-Muslim world and the Axis powers Germany and Italy, demanding that Germany and Italy recognized the independence of the Arab states and their right to reverse the evil steps taken towards the creation of a fake Jewish homeland in Palestine for European Rothschild.

They are different from their Sephardic brothers not only in language and appearance but also in their worldview.” Or take Palestinian activist Ghada Karmi, who says: “We knew they were different from ‘our Jews,’ I am talking about the Arab Jews. We saw them as foreigners who came from Europe more than as Jews.”

What happened at the meeting with Adolf Hitler?

In October 1941, al-Husseini met with German foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop in Berlin on November 20. One week later, on November 28, the meeting with Hitler took place which gave rise to Netanyahu’s comments.

However, the course of the conversation was quite different from what Netanyahu would have us believe, as the official German records show.

During the meeting, al-Husseini assured Hitler that: “The Arabs were Germany’s natural friends because they had the same enemies as had Germany, namely the British, the Zionists and the Communists”, and that “they were prepared to cooperate with Germany with all their hearts”.

95551255-A8D9-442D-B31B-E1EB01B0F4EF_cx0_cy3_cw0_mw1024_s_n_r1

He said the Arabs “could be more useful to Germany as allies than might be apparent at first glance, both for geographical reasons and because of the suffering inflicted upon them by the British and the Jewish cabal.”

Hitler in return confirmed that “Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jewish cabal”, including active opposition to the “Jewish national home” in Palestine. He set out to al-Husseini that:

Germany was resolved, step by step, to ask one European nation after the other to solve its Jewish problem, and at the proper time to direct a similar appeal to non-European nations as well.

Archbishop Sebastia Theodosios (Atallah Hanna): I am proud of my religion and nationality, I am proud to belong to my fatherland. I am a Palestinian, and I belong to this religious people who are fighting for the sake of their freedom and dignity to implement their dreams and national rights.

Even if one assumes that the official records would not state in writing how exactly the “Jewish problem” was to be “solved”, it is ludicrous to think that the Grand Mufti could have inspired Hitler during this meeting to move from a plan of mass expulsion to industrial annihilation.While Nazi policy had officially encouraged Jewish emigration – albeit after depriving them of their property – this had never been a realistic option for the solution of the “Jewish question” after the outbreak of World War II. Not for Rothschild.


Nuremberg Trial April 1946LT. COL. GRIFFITH-JONES:  Would you look at Page 37-B, which is an issue of 10 September 1943: “Statistics presented by the Convening Committee showed that 5 millions out of the 8.5 million Jews of Europe had died or been deported… About 3 million Jews had lost their lives through forced labor and deportation.”
Did you read that one?
Herr Streicher (publisher of Der Stuermer)  : I do not know, and again I would not have believed it. To this day I do not believe that 5 million were killed. I consider it technically impossible that that could have happened. I do not believe it. I have not received proof of that up until now.

And neither has anyone received proof up until now, 2016!


It is, therefore, absurd to suggest that al-Husseini inspired Hitler to switch his anti-Jewish policy from expulsion to “extermination”.

Why has Netanyahu arrived at this interpretation?

It is not the first time Netanyahu- Mileikowsky  tried to suggest that the Arab leader was somehow behind the false idea of a physical extermination of the European Jews. He did so before, in 2012.

Benjamin Netanyahu speaking at the Zionist Congress on October 20. Amir Cohen/Reuters

By claiming that there exists a century-old tradition of anti-Semitism among SEMITE Palestinians culminating in active participation in the annihilation of the  non-Semitic Jewish people, Netanyahu- Mileikowsky wants to establish a line of direct and straight-forward historical continuity from the Holohoax to today’s ongoing tensions. He implies that today’s Intifada has nothing to do with “Israel’s” occupation of the West Bank, the separation barrier, the question of  non-Semitic foreign Jewish settlements on Semite native Palestinian lands or the general socio-economic situation of the Palestinians, but that at its core is simply ingrained “anti-semitism”.

There’s no doubt: Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini was anti-fake Israel for his own state of Palestine and the welfare of the people, Jews, Christians and Muslims of Palestine.

Holocaust: A Jew-on-Jew False Flag Operation

Palestine was not desolate and under developed. The majority of Jews who went to Palestine were impoverished eastern Europeans who were bankrolled into going there by the Rothschilds/Jewish Fund.

Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Dushinsky, Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem (1867-1948) “We wish to express our definite opposition to a Jewish state in any part of Palestine.”

Both Palestinians and Jews have lived for thousands of years in the region known as Palestine. The Rothschild Zionist European Jews never existed in the Holy Land.

Zionism was a vocal, but minority, Jewish movement at the turn of the 20th Century. True, many Jews would have liked a Jewish homeland, but few were willing to give up the comforts of European living and move to an undeveloped and desolate region such as Palestine. This posed a seemingly insurmountable problem to extremely powerful and well positioned Jews who wanted a Jewish state–“Big Zionist Jews” as I term them.

These Jews in leadership positions needed to people their fledgling state with ordinary, hitherto non-Zionist Jews–or “Little Jews” as I term them. So how to do this? What would have to happen to get Little Jews to eagerly make the journey to Palestine and become Zionists themselves? The answer: the Holocaust.

But wait, weren’t the Nazis the ones who authored and carried out the Holocaust? Surely this reportedly unassailable fact cannot be denied, can it? Isn’t one “blaming the victim” by assigning responsibility to Jews for the genesis and horrors of the Holocaust and not the Nazis? The Jews were the victims here–we must not forget–not the perpetrators, right?

Well, not quite. To begin with, it must first be acknowledged that the Nazis were the most anti-colonialist European power during their reign in Germany. This should not surprise anyone. After all, Great Britain, France, Russia, and the United States all held, in one form or another, colonies abroad while Germany was stripped of its colonies after World War I.

Fomenting unrest in European colonies served both German interests as well as nationalist sentiment among the common people of the colonially dominated foreign state. There was one exception to Nazi anti-colonialism, however, and that was that the Nazis supported a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

imageedit_237_6218594633

“We were here first”145325126174585 “we did not invade European Jews!”

The Nazis encouraged Jews to emigrate to Palestine (a British colony) and even set up a transfer agreement, the Haavara Agreement of August 25th, 1933, to facilitate transferring German Jews to Palestine. This was signed by the Zionist Federation of Germany and Nazi economic authorities.

Curiously, skipping ahead, when President Roosevelt finally called for an international meeting to take place in July of 1938 at Evian, France, representatives from 32 countries met to discuss if and how to relocate Jews from Nazi Germany; only the Dominican Republic agreed to accept more Jewish refugees.

Curiously, Nazi Germany was not invited to attend the Conference even though it was held right across the border. As for Roosevelt’s ambassador to the meeting, the banker Myron Taylor, he was not even a government official but rather merely a personal friend of the President; this just goes to show how cavalier and unconcerned Roosevelt himself was in coming to the aid of Little Jews. Perhaps significantly, “Evian” spelled backwards is “naive.”

Nazi Germany under Hitler certainly did not want a world war. Hitler ran on the plank of returning German nationalists who had been split off from Germany (thanks to the woefully ill conceived national boundaries set forth in the Versailles Treaty) back to Germany proper. Once he was able to do this, after the defeat of Poland and reincorporating Germans living there back into the Reich, Hitler was content to bring a halt to the war. This is why Hitler and the Nazis waited, after conquering Poland, for three-quarters of a year before invading France.

This period is known of as the famous “Sitzkreig” or “sitting war.” It was simply foolish and against all military principles and common sense not to immediately invade France right after the lightening Nazi victory over Poland. This 9 month interim gave the French and British valuable time to ramp up their munitions manufacturing and call up more citizens for military conscription and training.

The Nazis had achieved their goal of reuniting Germans with Germany, and because the Nazis wanted the war now to end they went as long as they could before reluctantly invading France. (As an interesting side note, the Nazis finally launched the invasion of France on the very day Winston Churchill, the bellicose and unabashed war-mongering minister, was sworn into office as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom on May 10th, 1940.)

This also explains why the third in command in the Nazi Reich, Rudolf Hess, later flew to Scotland on May 10, 1941, on the one year anniversary of the invasion of France, to negotiate a peace between England and Germany (only to be arrested and held in Spandau Prison in solitary confinement for 45+ years until he died; one wonders what things he could tell that so frightened the Allied and Zionist leadership so that they diligently kept him away from the public; many convicted Holocaust criminals served much less jail time and were then released!).

Nazi peacemakers would only confuse the Allied public over the justness of their cause so better to hold Hess incommunicado until his death in August of 1987, or so must have went Allied thinking.

Allied and Zionist Procrastination and the Holocaust.

It is my contention that the Allied and Zionist leadership collaborated and were consciously and deliberately negligent in allowing–nay, ensuring–that the Holocaust happened. I am not able to marshal all of the evidence for that here in this short essay so I will just list some of the more salient highlights that support this thesis.

To begin with, at the Casablanca Conference of January 14th to the 24th, 1943, Churchill and Roosevelt declared that only “unconditional surrender” was acceptable to the Allies. While this sounds all well and good to xenophobes and pathological “patriots,” in real terms it meant that since there was no incentive for the Nazis to surrender conditionally that the war would be fought to its bitter end. Furthermore, and significantly, this meeting took place just as the Nazis were undergoing their momentous defeat at Stalingrad in January of 1943.

This defeat of the Wehrmacht spelled the inevitable undoing of the Nazi Reich, so just as the Nazis were most prone to sue for a conditional peace, the Allies preempted that option by demanding only total, complete, and merciless surrender. (Also as a curious aside, Churchill was once asked by a reporter if he would offer peace terms to the Nazis. Churchill’s answer: “Of course not–they just might accept it!”) Needless to say, if the Allies accepted a Nazi surrender in 1943, literally millions of lives could have been spared, including those in the internment camps.

Still referencing the year 1943 and how the Allies deliberately procrastinated in bringing the War to an end, General George Marshall wanted to invade Nazi-occupied France on April 1st of 1943. General Marshall was the one assigned to draw up plans for the sea-borne invasion of Europe; the name for this plan was Operation Overlord. This too would have brought an earlier end to the war, but Roosevelt and Churchill over-ruled him and only got around to approving the sea-borne invasion over one year later, for June 6th, 1944. Once again, millions of lives could have been spared had this earlier invasion gone forward.

Turning now to how the leader of the American Jewish community, Rabbi Stephen Wise, President of the Zionist Organization of America, and how he responded to the internment of millions of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe: Rabbi Wise ordered that absolutely no care packages be sent to malnourished Jews in the Nazi internment camps even though the Red Cross verified that the care packages were, in fact, delivered to the internees.

Rabbi Wise also deliberately tried to hinder publicity about the Holocaust; he actively intervened to prohibit the production of “We Will Never Die,” a pageant on the sufferings of Jews during the War. Why would Rabbi Wise do this? Why wouldn’t he want the world to know about the Holocaust? Simple: this Big Jew Zionist leader wanted Jews to suffer as much as possible during the War so as to realized Rabbi Wise’s dream of establishing and peopling with Jews a Jewish state in Palestine.

imageedit_1_6757199112

israel-palestine-house-bulldozer-demolition

If the War came to an end too quickly, the run-of-the-mill non-Zionist Jews would settle back into their comfortable European existence. All Jews needed to become Zionists, and that Big Zionist goal has been largely very successfully accomplished today–courtesy of the Zionist and Allied orchestrated and manufactured Holocaust.

There was a famine in Nazi-occupied Europe during the last year and a half of the War, 1944 to 1945. This meant that those on the very bottom rung of the social pyramid, namely, internment camp prisoners, would be the last to receive food. No surprise here. What caps this off however is that the Allies completely destroyed the transportation infrastructure of Nazi-occupied Europe so that foodstuffs and supplies were severely interdicted, and this made things even worse in the camps. Therefore, here as well, the Allies bear at least some responsibility for the severely emaciated prisoners held in German internment camps at the end of the War.

Of course the Allies and Big Jews such as Rabbi Wise claimed that there was no Holocaust happening to the Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe during the War (and, ironically, they very well may have been right–albeit duplicitous–because there is absolutely no independent scientific statistical evidence that anyone died of Zyklon B poisoning in the camps, but this is the subject matter of another essay).

“Why would President Roosevelt and the most prominent Jewish leader here in the U.S. want to silence any knowledge of the internment camps during the War? Simple: because if they did not silence public knowledge of the Holocaust that would have required the Allies to both seek an earlier end to the war (once again by possibly accepting a conditional surrender from the Nazis) and because the Little Jews would not have suffered enough in the camps so as to convert them into die-hard Zionists and have them emigrate to Palestine.

Simply put: the Big Zionist overlords needed a loyal cadre of Jewish denizens to rule over so they got their wish by fomenting and orchestrating what we know of today as “The Holocaust.” [admin: they also needed to fulfill a particular population quota to satisfy the requirement of establishing a state.]

Finally, what about the role of the Nazis in all of this? Surely they share a portion of blame. Yes they do, but not as much as one has been pre-conditioned and indoctrinated to believe. I like to use the analogy of a man holding a handgun to the head of a near-sighted victim.

The man represents a Big Zionist/Allied figure; the handgun represents a Nazi-figure; and the cowering, near-sighted, and kneeling victim is a Little Jew Holocaust-figure. The victim can only see what is immediately in front of his face, the Luger/Nazi-figure; the victim does not see the figure who has his hand on the Luger’s trigger, the Big Zionist Jew.

This is how I have come to understand the Holocaust. All that was left to do once the war was won was to unilaterally, unrelentingly, and universally blame the Nazis and the Germany citizenry for being solely responsible for the Holocaust, and self-serving propaganda eventually turns into dogmatic historical fact.

Of course this all goes a long way towards explaining the profound insecurity of the Holocaust community when it comes to challenges to their authority and why they are so insistent on demonizing and criminalizing Holocaust Truthers such as myself. What the Big Jews fear most is that Little Jews just might–if they have courage enough to remove the blinders from their eyes–look into the mirror before uncritically assigning blame for the Holocaust to the usual suspects.

I could, of course, say much much more, but this should suffice for now. I leave it to Free-thinking independent readers to vet what I have written here and make up their own minds concerning who is really responsible for the Holocaust.


Vaughn Klingenberg biography: Have a Masters Degree in Philosophy from Marquette University where I also taught Logic; have a Bachelors Degree in Philosophy from Hamline University. Self-published two books on Shakespeare, Hamlet-Christ and Paradigm Shift: Shakespeare, under the pseudonym “Odysseus Er.” Composed a manuscript on the Holocaust entitled, The Big Lie: The Holocaust (An Introduction to the Greatest Fraud of the 20th Century), under my own name. Lived in Europe for over two years, mostly in London and in Poznan, Poland; well traveled throughout Europe and the Middle East (spent a month in Israel). Right now I am in the process of working on a booklet on Nazi and Allied strategic psy-ops and counter-psy-ops during World War II. Have a Polish wife and two bi-lingual children, and reside in a suburb of Saint Paul, Minnesota. The website for my books and writings is www.booksbyvk.org

For more details on my assessment of the Holocaust, please visit my website: www.booksbyvk.org ; See the manuscript: The Big Lie: The Holocaust (An Introduction to the Greatest Fraud of the 20th Century).